Cited by 875Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth Policy Implementation Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health: a Research-to-Practice Perspective

Open access

Abstract

Purpose of review Globally, the majority of those who need mental health care worldwide lack access to high-quality mental health services. Stigma, human resource shortages, fragmented service delivery models, and lack of research capacity for implementation and policy change contribute to the current mental health treatment gap. In this review, we describe how health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are addressing the mental health gap and further identify challenges and priority areas for future research.Recent findings Common mental disorders are responsible for the largest proportion of the global burden of disease; yet, there is sound evidence that these disorders, as well as severe mental disorders, can be successfully treated using evidence-based interventions delivered by trained lay health workers in low-resource community or primary care settings. Stigma is a barrier to service uptake. Prevention, though necessary to address the mental health gap, has not solidified as a research or programmatic focus. Research-to-practice implementation studies are required to inform policies and scale-up services. Four priority areas are identified for focused attention to diminish the mental health treatment gap and to improve access to high-quality mental health services globally: diminishing pervasive stigma, building mental health system treatment and research capacity, implementing prevention programs to decrease the incidence of mental disorders, and establishing sustainable scale up of public health systems to improve access to mental health treatment using evidence-based interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-017-0780-z

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 105 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Sweetland AC, Oquendo MA, Carlson C, Magidson JF, Wainberg ML. Mental health research in the global era: training the next generation. Acad Psychiatry. 2015;40:1–6.
  2. Da Silva TFC, Lovisi G, Conover S, Susser E. Critical time intervention–task shifting (CTI-TS): a psychosocial intervention for people with severe mental illness in Latin America. Global Advanced Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2014;3(5):087–9.
  3. Organization WH. Thinking healthy: a manual for psychosocial management of perinatal depression, WHO generic field-trial version 1.0, 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
  4. Kates J, The U.S. Government and global LGBT health: opportunities and challenges in the current era. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: Menlo Park; 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–875 of 875

Metadata

Authors
Wainberg, M. L., Scorza, P., Shultz, J. M., Helpman, L., Mootz, J. J., Johnson, K. A., Neria, Y., Bradford, J.-M. E., Oquendo, M. A., & Arbuckle, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Wainberg, Milton L.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2017-04-19
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
28-28
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2606586703
Cited by
875
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 117 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH096724)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
global mental health, mental health treatment gap, access to mental health care, mental health stigma, common mental disorders, severe mental illness, lay health workers, community mental health services, primary care, mental health prevention, implementation research, research capacity building, low- and middle-income countries, mental health policy
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Public Health, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review