CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 167Gender, Feminism, and MediaSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults' negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting

Burkett, Melissa·2015·Sexuality & Culture
DOI 10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies found similar negative reactions to dick pics: Burkett's (2015) qualitative study with girls calling dick pic senders creeps and weirdos; Marcotte et al.'s (2021) study of adult women describing being grossed out and disrespected; and Mandau's (2019) study of aged 17 and above participants finding dick pics repulsive, shocking, and intrusive.

    “The negative reactions align with Burkett ' s (2015) qualitative study with girls calling dick pic senders ' creeps ' and ' weirdos ' (p. 848); Marcotte et al.'s (2021) study of adult women participants who described being ' grossed out ' and feeling ' disrespected ' and Mandau ' s (2019) study of aged 17 and above participants who found dick pics ' repulsive, ' ' shocking, ' and ' intru”

    From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Burkett, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burkett, M.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Burkett, Melissa
Venue
Sexuality & Culture
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-07-11
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
835-863
ISSN
  • 1095-5143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4822
DOI
10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0
OpenAlex
W1160328018
Cited by
167
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
17.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Sexuality & Culture (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Edith Cowan University
  • Murdoch University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
sexting, young adults, dating relationships, casual sex, peer relationships, sexual risk, intimate relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review