Cited by 59Gender, Feminism, and MediaStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

‘Directly in Your Face’: A Qualitative Study on the Sending and Receiving of Unsolicited ‘Dick Pics’ Among Young Adults

Mandau, Morten Birk Hansen·2020·Sexuality & Culture

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12119-019-09626-2

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mandau, M. B. H.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Mandau, Morten Birk Hansen
Venue
Sexuality & Culture
Published
2019-06-24
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
72-93
ISSN
  • 1095-5143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4822
OpenAlex
W2950935539
Cited by
59
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sexuality & Culture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
sexting, young adults, male nudity, humor, flirting, hooking up, sexual harassment, gender differences in sexual behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review