Cited by 48Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Image-based sexual abuse: Victim-perpetrator overlap and risk-related correlates of coerced sexting, non-consensual dissemination of intimate images, and cyberflashing

Open access
Sparks, Brandon, Stephens, Skye, Trendell, Sydney·2023·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

The advent of technology has dramatically changed the way sexual violence is perpetrated and experienced. Understanding the context of image-based sexual abuse (IBSA) and risk factors associated with perpetration are key to effective prevention efforts. The present study explores three IBSA behaviours—coerced sexting, non-consensual dissemination of intimate images, and cyberflashing—to examine the degree of victim-perpetrator overlap and what risk factors from the extant sexual violence literature are relevant to each behaviour. Emerging adults (n = 541; 69% female, 31% male) were recruited from a local university in Nova Scotia and the broader community (not specific to Nova Scotia) and reported their perpetration and victimization experiences with the three forms of IBSA. Participants also completed measures relating to their offense-supportive attitudes, dark triad traits, sadism, sexual compulsivity, impulsivity, and substance use. Results indicated substantial victim-perpetrator overlap for non-consensual dissemination of intimate images and cyberflashing. Victim-perpetrators demonstrated a pattern of higher scores across all risk-related measures, the magnitude of which differed across IBSA behaviours. These findings suggest that the broader literature on sexual offending is relevant to understanding IBSA and fits with the wider literature that suggests overlap between victimization and perpetration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107879

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reciprocal sexting might explain the victim-offender overlap: romantic partners come into possession of intimate images of one another, and when the relationship disintegrates, one partner might threaten to share the other's intimate images and they may retaliate in kind.

    “Moreover, reciprocal sexting might further explain this overlap—as noted by Sparks et al. (2023) in relation to the nonconsensual sharing of intimate images—as romantic partners come into possession of intimate images of one another, when the relationship disintegrates, one partner might threaten to share the other’s intimate images, and they may retaliate in kind and threaten to do the same.”

    From Sextortion: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Sparks et al. (2023)

  • Sparks et al. (2023) found 15.0% had engaged in cyberflashing (n = 908).

    “Sparks et al. (2023) found that 15.0% had engaged in cyberflashing (sending an “unsolicited sexually explicit image or video”) (n = 908).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Sparks et al. (2023)

  • Sparks et al. (2023) found 22.0% of respondents reported sexting coercion (n = 908).

    “Finally, in the study by Sparks et al. (2023), a high number (22.0%) of respondents reported sexting coercion (but no breakdown of gender reported) (n = 908).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Sparks et al. (2023)

  • Sparks et al. (2023) found all four Dark Tetrad traits showed significant positive relationship with nonconsensual dissemination behaviors.

    “Sparks et al. (2023) found that all four Dark Tetrad traits showed a significant positive relationship with nonconsensual dissemination behaviors.”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Sparks et al. (2023)

  • In Sparks et al. (2023), victims of nonconsensual dissemination were nearly three times as likely to have perpetrated that behavior.

    “In Sparks et al. (2023), victims of nonconsensual dissemination were nearly three times as likely to have perpetrated that behavior.”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Sparks et al. (2023)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sparks, B., Stephens, S., & Trendell, S.
Affiliations
Kingston University London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sparks, Brandon
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
148
Pages
107879
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384831596
Cited by
48
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
FWCI
20.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
image-based sexual abuse, cyberflashing, emerging adults, dark triad traits, sadism, compulsive sexual behavior, impulsivity, substance use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review