Cited by 20Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSleep and related disordersChild Development and Digital Technology

Sleep disturbances partially mediate the association between problematic internet use and somatic symptomatology in adolescence

Cerutti, R., Spensieri, V., Amendola, S., Presaghi, F., Fontana, A., Faedda, N., Guidetti, V.·2021·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-019-00414-7

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cerutti, R., Spensieri, V., Amendola, S., Presaghi, F., Fontana, A., Faedda, N., & Guidetti, V.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT)
Corresponding author
Cerutti, R.
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2019-08-11
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
4581-4589
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W2966925133
Cited by
20
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
problematic internet use, internet addiction, sleep disorders, somatic symptoms, sleep quality, adolescents, mediation, psychophysical well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review