Cited by 330Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

A Prospective School-based Study of Abdominal Pain and Other Common Somatic Complaints in Children

Saps, Miguel, Seshadri, Roopa, Sztainberg, Marcelo, Schaffer, Gilda, Marshall, Beth M., Di Lorenzo, Carlo·2009·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To determine the prevalence and impact of pediatric abdominal pain (AP).Study design Prospective cohort study (12/2005-06/2006), with gastrointestinal and other symptoms assessed weekly. Anxiety, depression, functional disability, quality of life, somatization, coping, school absenteeism and medical care were assessed in 237 students in the third through eighth grades (11.8 years; 134 girls) from 2 public schools weekly. Complete data were obtained on 4606 of 5175 (89%) possible questionnaires.Results Seventy-two percent of children reported >1 somatic symptom weekly, and 45% of children reported >1 gastrointestinal symptom weekly. The weekly prevalence of AP was 38%, and 90% of children reported AP at least once. AP persisted >4 consecutive weeks in 52% of children and was associated with higher anxiety (P < .001) and depression (P < .001) scores and worse quality of life (P < .001). Twenty-three percent of children missed school for AP (average, 2.3 days), and 10% of parents of those children missed work (average, 1.9 days). Presence of AP (P < .001) was independently associated with school absences. Four children (2%) sought medical attention.Conclusions AP is common in school-age children and is associated with worse quality of life, psychological co-morbidities, school absenteeism, and parental work absences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.09.047

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saps, M., Seshadri, R., Sztainberg, M., Schaffer, G., Marshall, B. M., & Di Lorenzo, C.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Northeastern Illinois University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
154
Issue
3
Pages
322-326
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014524519
Cited by
330
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
pediatric abdominal pain, somatic symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, prevalence, school absenteeism, quality of life, anxiety, depression, somatization, coping, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Anxiety, Chicago, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Students, Abdominal Pain, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review