Cited by 429Physical Activity and HealthMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsBehavioral Health and Interventions

A Review and Meta-Analysis of Affective Judgments and Physical Activity in Adult Populations

Rhodes, Ryan E., Fiala, Bonnie, Conner, Mark·2009·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Popular theories of health behavior have often been criticized for neglecting an affective component to behavioral engagement. PURPOSE: This study reviewed affective judgment (AJ) constructs employed in physical activity research to assess the relationship with behavior. Studies were eligible if they included: (a) a measure of physical activity; (b) a distinct measure of AJ (e.g., affective attitude, enjoyment, intrinsic motivation); and (c) involved participants with a mean age of 18 years or older. METHODS: Literature searches were concluded in September, 2009 among five key search engines. This search yielded a total of 10,631 potentially relevant records; of these, 102 passed the eligibility criteria. Random effects meta-analysis procedures with correction for sampling and measurement bias were employed in the analysis. RESULTS: Articles were published between 1989 and 2009, with sample sizes ranging from 15 to 6,739. Of the studies included, 82 were correlational and 20 were experimental, yielding 114 independent samples. The majority of the correlational samples reported a significant positive correlation between AJ and physical activity (83 out of 85), with a summary r of 0.42 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.46) that was invariant across the measures employed, study quality, population sampled and cultural variables. Experimental studies demonstrated that persuasive, information-based, and self-regulatory interventions failed to change AJ; by contrast, environmental and experiential interventions showed promise in their capability to influence AJ. CONCLUSIONS: The results point to a medium-effect size relationship between AJ and physical activity. Interventions that change AJ are scarce despite their potential for changing physical activity. Future experimental work designed to evaluate the causal impact ofAJ on physical activity is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-009-9147-y

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 165 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhodes, R. E., Fiala, B., & Conner, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Rhodes, Ryan E.
  • Fiala, Bonnie
  • Conner, Mark
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2009-12
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
180-204
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W1974130180
Cited by
429
References
165
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
affective judgment, physical activity, affective attitudes, enjoyment, intrinsic motivation, health behavior, persuasive interventions, environmental interventions, experiential interventions, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Humans, Judgment, Motivation, Motor Activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review