Cited by 139Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

More efficient, perhaps, but at what price? Pleasure and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval exercise in low-active women with obesity

Decker, Emily S., Ekkekakis, Panteleimon·2017·Psychology of Sport and Exercise

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.09.005

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Decker, E. S., & Ekkekakis, P.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Venue
Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
28
Pages
1-10
ISSN
1469-0292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2519659878
Cited by
139
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of sport and exercise (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
high-intensity interval exercise, moderate-intensity continuous training, exercise enjoyment, obese women, physical inactivity, exercise sustainability, recumbent cycling, ventilatory threshold, Feeling Scale, Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review