Cited by 4Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy and History of ScienceEmbodied and Extended Cognition

What if Consciousness has no Function?

Belardinelli, Sofia, Pievani, Telmo·2023·Biosemiotics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12304-023-09533-y

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The priority placed on adaptive explanations goes back to Darwin's time and persists today.

    “The priority placed on adaptive explanations goes back to Darwin’s time, with Darwin’s protegee, J. G. Romanes, writing:”

    From Consciousness at sea (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belardinelli, S., & Pievani, T.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Belardinelli, Sofia
  • Pievani, Telmo
Venue
Biosemiotics
Published
2023-04-17
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
259-267
ISSN
  • 1875-1342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-1350
OpenAlex
W4366210617
Cited by
4
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biosemiotics (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
consciousness, function of consciousness, learning, evolutionary framework, interdisciplinary approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review