Cited by 99Embodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceCognitive Science and Education Research

Evolutionary transitions in learning and cognition

Open access
Ginsburg, Simona, Jablonka, Eva·2021·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B

Abstract

We define a cognitive system as a system that can learn, and adopt an evolutionary-transition-oriented framework for analysing different types of neural cognition. This enables us to classify types of cognition and point to the continuities and discontinuities among them. The framework we use for studying evolutionary transitions in learning capacities focuses on qualitative changes in the integration, storage and use of neurally processed information. Although there are always grey areas around evolutionary transitions, we recognize five major neural transitions, the first two of which involve animals at the base of the phylogenetic tree: (i) the evolutionary transition from learning in non-neural animals to learning in the first neural animals; (ii) the transition to animals showing limited, elemental associative learning, entailing neural centralization and primary brain differentiation; (iii) the transition to animals capable of unlimited associative learning, which, on our account, constitutes sentience and entails hierarchical brain organization and dedicated memory and value networks; (iv) the transition to imaginative animals that can plan and learn through selection among virtual events; and (v) the transition to human symbol-based cognition and cultural learning. The focus on learning provides a unifying framework for experimental and theoretical studies of cognition in the living world. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Basal cognition: multicellularity, neurons and the cognitive lens’.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2019.0766

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The priority placed on adaptive explanations goes back to Darwin's time and persists today.

    “The priority placed on adaptive explanations goes back to Darwin’s time, with Darwin’s protegee, J. G. Romanes, writing:”

    From Consciousness at sea (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Ginsburg and Jablonka's account of the emergence of more sophisticated forms of consciousness as major evolutionary transitions does not fit the major transitions model.

    “However, while these events may have been monumental from the standpoint of both biology and morality, and though they may be of great personal significance to human beings, they do not fit the major transitions model.”

    From Consciousness at sea (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ginsburg, S., & Jablonka, E.
Affiliations
  • Open University of Israel (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Ginsburg, Simona
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
376
Issue
1821
Pages
20190766-20190766
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W3126647909
Cited by
98
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
evolutionary transitions, learning, cognition, associative learning, sentience, memory, value networks, planning, cultural learning, brain evolution, animal cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Biological Evolution, Learning, Phylogeny

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review