Cited by 191Health Policy Implementation ScienceSchool Health and Nursing EducationEducational Assessment and Improvement

From Evidence to Impact: Joining Our Best School Mental Health Practices with Our Best Implementation Strategies

Open access
Lyon, Aaron R., Bruns, Eric J.·2019·School Mental Health

Abstract

There is substantial research evidence for the effectiveness of school mental health strategies across problem areas, developmental levels, and the prevention-intervention spectrum. At the same time, it is clear that the education and mental health fields continue to struggle to apply this evidence at any level of scale. This commentary reflects on ways in which education-specific applications of implementation science principles - and explicit consideration of determinants of implementation success - may guide more consistent use of evidence in school mental health. After reviewing implementation determinants and strategies across multiple levels of effect (i.e., the outer setting, inner setting, individual, and intervention levels), the commentary goes on to recommend specific areas of needed attention in school mental health implementation efforts and research. These include a need to adapt interventions to better fit the context of schools, streamlining school mental health programs and practices to make them more implementable, and recognizing the critical role of assessment and selection of evidence-based interventions by school leaders. The commentary concludes by reflecting on the substantial opportunity provided by the education sector to both apply and advance implementation science.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12310-018-09306-w

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence-based practices are inconsistently adopted, delivered with fidelity, or sustained over time in schools.

    “However, EBP are inconsistently adopted, delivered with fidelity, or sustained over time in schools [5, 6].”

    From Leading the charge in the education sector: development and validation of the School Implementation Leadership Scale (SILS) (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The section “Viewing School Mental Health Interventions through an Implementation Lens” describes inadequate implementation support in schools and a need to improve adherent uptake of research-based practices. The Conclusion also reports that many EBP implementation efforts fail. These passages support inconsistent adoption and fidelity, but they do not establish that school-based EBPs are inconsistently sustained over time; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lewis CC (2017, 9). What are implementation mechanisms and why do they matter? Plenary presentation at the 2017 Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC). Seattle, WA.
  2. Lyon AR, Cook CR, Locke J, Davis C, Powell BJ, & Waltz TJ (under review). Importance and feasibility of an adapted set of strategies for implementing evidence-based mental health practices in schools.
  3. Lyon AR, Koerner K, & Chung J (2018, 12). How Implementable is that Evidence-Based Practice? A Methodology for Assessing Complex Innovation Usability Paper presented a the 11th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation. Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyon, A. R., & Bruns, E. J.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Lyon, Aaron R.
Venue
School Mental Health
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
106-114
ISSN
  • 1866-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-2633
OpenAlex
W2907495525
Cited by
191
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • School Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH109605)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
implementation science, evidence-based interventions, implementation factors, implementation strategies, school leaders, intervention adaptation, school-based mental health programs, prevention and intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review