Cited by 121Doctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsMentoring and Academic DevelopmentInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

Supportive Chinese supervisor, innovative international students: A social exchange theory perspective

Fan, Luo, Mahmood, Monowar, Uddin, Md. Aftab·2019·Asia Pacific Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12564-018-9572-3

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, L., Mahmood, M., & Uddin, M. A.
Affiliations
  • KIMEP University (KZ)
  • University of Chittagong (BD)
Corresponding author
Uddin, Md. Aftab
Venue
Asia Pacific Education Review
Published
2018-12-17
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
101-115
ISSN
  • 1598-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-407X
OpenAlex
W2905252173
Cited by
121
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia Pacific Education Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
Global Teaching Innovation, Wuhan University of Technology (w2014034)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
supervisor support, supportive supervision, international doctoral students, research innovation, social exchange theory, doctoral supervision, organizational citizenship behavior, creativity, mentoring, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review