Cited by 57Innovative Teaching MethodsInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Flipped classroom improves academic achievement, learning retention and attitude towards course: a meta-analysis

Tutal, Özgür, Yazar, Taha·2021·Asia Pacific Education Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12564-021-09706-9

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 139 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tutal, Ö., & Yazar, T.
Affiliations
  • Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği (TR)
  • Dicle University (TR)
Corresponding author
Tutal, Özgür
Venue
Asia Pacific Education Review
Published
2021-06-09
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
655-673
ISSN
  • 1598-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-407X
OpenAlex
W3168268489
Cited by
57
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia Pacific Education Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
flipped classroom, academic performance, learning retention, educational effectiveness, small class size, elementary school, implementation duration, lecture method, moderators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review