Cited by 505Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 172 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Moving Beyond Mindfulness: Defining Equanimity as an Outcome Measure in Meditation and Contemplative Research

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In light of a growing interest in contemplative practices such as meditation, the emerging field of contemplative science has been challenged to describe and objectively measure how these practices affect health and well-being. While “mindfulness” itself has been proposed as a measurable outcome of contemplative practices, this concept encompasses multiple components, some of which, as we review here, may be better characterized as equanimity. Equanimity can be defined as an even-minded mental state or dispositional tendency toward all experiences or objects, regardless of their origin or their affective valence (pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral). In this article, we propose that equanimity be used as an outcome measure in contemplative research. We first define and discuss the inter-relationship between mindfulness and equanimity from the perspectives of both classical Buddhism and modern psychology and present existing meditation techniques for cultivating equanimity. We then review psychological, physiological, and neuroimaging methods that have been used to assess equanimity either directly or indirectly. In conclusion, we propose that equanimity captures potentially the most important psychological element in the improvement of well-being, and therefore should be a focus in future research studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 172 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bodhi, B. (2000). A comprehensive manual of Abhidhamma: the philosophical psychology of Buddhism. Onalaska: Buddhist Publication Society Pariyatti Editions.
  2. Dalai Lama. (2001b). Dzogchen: the heart essence of the great perfection. Ithaca: Snow Lion.
  3. Dalai Lama. (2001c). An open heart: practicing compassion in everyday life. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
  4. Makransky, J. (2007). Awakening through love: unveiling your deepest goodness. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.
  5. Nanamoli, B. (1991). The path of purification. Onalaska: Buddhist Publication Society Pariyatti Editions.
  6. Salzberg, S. (1995). Loving-kindness: the revolutionary art of happiness. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
  7. Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2010). Handbook of self-regulation, second edition: research, theory, and applications. New York: The Guilford Press.
  8. Wallace, B. A. (2010). The four immeasurables: practices to open the heart. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 504

Metadata

Authors
Desbordes, G., Gard, T., Hoge, E. A., Hölzel, B. K., Kerr, C., Lazar, S. W., Olendzki, A., & Vago, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Desbordes, Gaëlle
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2014-01-21
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
356-372
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2075305762
Cited by
505
References
172
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6
FWCI
36.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT004432, R21AT003425, K01AT008225, R01AT006344)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
equanimity, meditation, contemplative science, outcome measures, well-being, Buddhist psychology, meditation techniques, emotional valence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review