Cited by 100Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionIndian and Buddhist Studies

The decoupling model of equanimity: theory, measurement, and test in a mindfulness intervention

Hadash, Yuval, Segev, Natalie, Tanay, Galia, Goldstein, Pavel, Bernstein, Amit·2016·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-016-0564-2

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-attachment can give rise to greater equanimity.

    “Furthermore, non-attachment can give rise to greater equanimity (Hadash et al., 2016; Eberth et al., 2019).”

    From Aspects of acceptance: building a shared conceptual understanding (2024) · cites this paper as Hadash et al., 2016

  • Non-reactivity is central to equanimity but generally missed in many definitions.

    “non-reactivity, which is central to equanimity (Eberth et al. 2019) but generally missed in many definitions (Hadash et al. 2016).”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Hadash et al. 2016

  • Hadash et al. (2016) found that development of mindfulness was associated with increased equanimity.

    “In their community sample ( N = 191), the authors found one higher order factor of equanimity and two lower order factors of reduced reactivity and an attitude of acceptance, and that development of mindfulness was associated with increased equanimity, which supported their model.”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Hadash et al. 2016

  • Lundman et al.'s equanimity items missed the central concept of non-reactivity.

    “However, equanimity items captured present focus, acceptance and an optimistic approach, all of which represent either part or peripheral aspects of equanimity and do not capture its entirety, missing the central concept of non-reactivity which is proposed by Hadash et al. (2016) and others (Cayoun 2011; Desbordes et al. 2015; Hart 1987).”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Hadash et al. 2016

  • In Hadash et al. (2016), equanimity was measured indirectly using existing measures.

    “While this study provided a clarified conceptualization of equanimity, the construct was measured indirectly using existing measures of distress tolerance and thought suppression to assess acceptance, and anxiety sensitivity and cognitive reactivity to sad mood to assess reactivity.”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Hadash et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hadash, Y., Segev, N., Tanay, G., Goldstein, P., & Bernstein, A.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Bernstein, Amit
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2016-07-13
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
1214-1226
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2464681150
Cited by
100
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation (IL) (1136/2011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
Keywords
equanimity, mindfulness training, Buddhist philosophy, hedonic tone, acceptance, state mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review