Cited by 25Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

A Systematic Literature Review of Equanimity in Mindfulness Based Interventions

Open access
Weber, Joey·2021·Pastoral Psychology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11089-021-00945-6

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the MB intervention, reductions in psychopathology are associated with the disruption of perseverative thought patterns and the creation of equanimity.

    “In the MB intervention, reductions in psychopathology are associated with the disruption of perseverative thought patterns and the creation of equanimity [104].”

    From 10-Week Trajectories of Candidate Psychological Processes Differentially Predict Mental Health Gains from Online Dyadic versus Mindfulness Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes decentering as a way to disengage from thoughts and suggests that equanimity may help regulate emotions. The paper hypothesizes that equanimity contributes to mental well-being, but it does not establish that disruption of perseverative thought patterns and creation of equanimity are associated with reductions in psychopathology during mindfulness-based interventions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Prabhavananda, S. T., & Isherwood, C. T. (Trans.). (1972). Bhagavad Gita: The song of God (3rd ed.). Hollywood, CA: Vedanta Society.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber, J.
Affiliations
University of Greater Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Weber, Joey
Venue
Pastoral Psychology
Published
2021-03-23
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
151-165
ISSN
  • 0031-2789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6679
OpenAlex
W3136346766
Cited by
25
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pastoral Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
equanimity, mindfulness-based interventions, mental health, psychiatric health, construct definition, psychometric assessment, non-judgment, decentering, well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review