Cited by 103Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The Effects of an Online Mindfulness Intervention on Perceived Stress, Depression and Anxiety in a Non-clinical Sample: A Randomised Waitlist Control Trial

Open access
Querstret, Dawn, Cropley, Mark, Fife-Schaw, Chris·2018·Mindfulness

Abstract

Mindfulness interventions have been shown to be effective for health and wellbeing, and delivering mindfulness programmes online may increase accessibility and reduce waiting times and associated costs; however, research assessing the effectiveness of online interventions is lacking. We sought to: (1) assess the effects of an online mindfulness intervention on perceived stress, depression and anxiety; (2) assess different facets of mindfulness (i.e. acting with awareness, describing, non-judging and non-reacting) as mechanisms of change and (3) assess whether the effect of the intervention was maintained over time. The sample was comprised of 118 adults (female, n = 95) drawn from the general population. Using a randomised waitlist control design, participants were randomised to either an intervention (INT) or waitlist control (WLC) group. Participants completed the online intervention, with the WLC group starting after a 6-week waitlist period. Participants completed measures of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and perceived stress (PSS-10) at baseline, post-treatment, 3- and 6-month follow-up. Participants who completed the mindfulness intervention ( n = 60) reported significantly lower levels of perceived stress ( d = − 1.25 [− 1.64, − 0.85]), anxiety ( d = − 1.09 [− 1.47, − 0.98]) and depression ( d = − 1.06 [− 1.44, − 0.67]), when compared with waitlist control participants ( n = 58), and these effects were maintained at follow-up. The effect of the intervention was primarily explained by increased levels of non-judging. This study provides support for online mindfulness interventions and furthers our understanding with regards to how mindfulness interventions exert their positive effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-018-0925-0

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study by Querstrert et al. revealed that even a four-week training might be sufficient.

    “A study by Querstrert et al. [27] revealed that even a four-week training might be sufficient.”

    From The Effectiveness of a Four-Week Online Mindfulness Training Course on Individual Mindfulness Skills and Personal Perception of Stress in Company Employees Working from Home (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section (Impact of Course Completion Time; page unavailable) says participants were encouraged to finish within four weeks, but only five did. It found no outcome differences between those finishing within six weeks and those taking longer; it did not assess four-week completers separately. The Discussion (Future Research; page unavailable) suggests shorter interventions may be fruitful, but does not establish that four weeks is sufficient. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The effects of 8-week mindfulness programs can last up to several months after the end of the program.

    “In previous studies, it has also been found that these effects can last up to several months after the end of the program (Khoury et al., 2015; Querstret et al., 2018).”

    From Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Increases Mental Wellbeing and Emotion Regulation During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Synchronous Online Intervention Study (2021) · cites this paper as Querstret et al., 2018

    The Discussion reports that reductions in perceived stress, depression and anxiety were maintained at 3- and 6-month follow-up. But the Method asks participants to complete this online course within 4 weeks, and the Results report an average completion time of about 6 weeks; the study does not establish the claim specifically for an 8-week program. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Querstret, D., Cropley, M., & Fife-Schaw, C.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Querstret, Dawn
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2018-05-02
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
1825-1836
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2802354969
Cited by
103
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Surrey
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
online mindfulness intervention, perceived stress, depression, anxiety, non-judgment, mechanisms of change, non-clinical adults, maintenance of intervention effects, waitlist control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review