Cited by 173Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and Health

A systematic review of the translational research on the Diabetes Prevention Program

Open access
Whittemore, Robin·2011·Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

International clinical trials have demonstrated compelling evidence on the prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes (T2D) by lifestyle change programs. Numerous studies have translated the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) protocol to "real-world" settings. The purpose of this paper is to review the translational research of the DPP protocol in adults at-risk for T2D. This study is a systematic review based on the guidelines from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. There were 16 studies that translated the DPP protocol in four distinct settings: (a) hospital outpatient, (b) primary care, (c) community, and (d) work and church. Settings varied considerably in terms of reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. There were strengths and limitations to each setting. Better understanding of program adaptation and mediators and moderators to program efficacy are indicated. Future research also needs to continue to explore mechanisms to improve access and long-term outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13142-011-0062-y

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]27. Kramer, M. K., Kriska, A. M., Venditti, E. M., et al. (2009). Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program: A comprehensive model for prevention training and program delivery. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(6), 505-511. doi:10.1016/j. amepre.2009.07.020. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whittemore, R.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Whittemore, Robin
Venue
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Published
2011-07-27
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
480-491
ISSN
  • 1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-6716
OpenAlex
W2003598964
Cited by
173
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
Diabetes Prevention Program, type 2 diabetes prevention, lifestyle intervention, program adaptation, real-world implementation, primary care, community settings, workplace health programs, church-based intervention, at-risk adults, program efficacy, mediators and moderators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review