Cited by 69Bee Products Chemical AnalysisEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAntifungal resistance and susceptibility

Antifungal effect of lavender honey against Candida albicans, Candida krusei and Cryptococcus neoformans

Open access
Estevinho, Maria Leticia, Afonso, Sílvia Esteves, Feás, Xesús·2011·Journal of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

Monofloral lavender honey samples (n = 30), were analyzed to test antifungal effect against Candida albicans, Candida krusei, and Cryptococcus neoformans. The specific growth rates (μ) showed that all the yeast growths were reduced in the presence of honey. The honey concentration (% w/v) that inhibited 10% of the yeasts growth (X min) ranged from 31.0% (C. albicans), 16.8% (C. krusei) and 23.0% (C. neoformans). A synthetic honey solution was also tested to determine antifungal activity attributable to sugars. The presence of synthetic honey in the C. krusei culture medium at concentrations above 58.0% (w/v) was established as X min, while C. albicans and C. neoformans were more resistant, since X min values were not reached over the ranged tested (10-60%, w/v). What the data suggests is that the component in the lavender honey responsible for the observed antifungal in vitro properties is not sugar based. Honey might be tapped as a natural resource to look for new medicines for the treatment of mycotic infections. This could be very useful, onsidering the increasing resistance of antifungals. It should be noticed that this is the first study concerning the effect of lavender honey on the growth of pathogenic yeasts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13197-011-0243-1

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The component(s) of honey responsible for the antifungal properties are not sugar based.

    “It is therefore suggested that the component(s) of honey responsible for the antifungal properties are not sugar based.”

    From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [243]

  • A synthetic honey solution had reduced antifungal activity compared to natural honey.

    “This observation was also reported in the study of Estevinho et al. [243], where a synthetic honey solution was tested to determine the antifungal activity that was attributable to sugars, only to find that the activity was reduced compared to natural honey.”

    From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [243]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bath PK, Singh N. Effect of microwave heating on hydroxymethylfurfural formation and browning in Helianthus annuus and Eucalyptus lanceolatus honey. J Food Sci Technol. 2001;38:366–368. [Google Scholar]
  2. Becker JM, Caldwell GA, Zachgo EA. Sterilization methods, biotechnology. 2. Academic Press: San Diego; 1996. pp. 210–211. [Google Scholar]
  3. Codex A. Codex standard 12– revised codex standard for honey. Stan Methods. 2002;11:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Naveena BM, Sen AR, Vaithiyanathan S, Muthukumar M, Babji Y. Effect of honey and vitamin C on quality of microwave cooked chicken patties. J Food Sci Technol. 2007;44:505–508. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Estevinho, M. L., Afonso, S. E., & Feás, X.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
  • Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Venue
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2011-02-11
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
640-643
ISSN
  • 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-8402
OpenAlex
W2040467146
Cited by
69
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Bee Products Chemical Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Keywords
lavender honey, antifungal activity, Candida albicans, Candida krusei, Cryptococcus neoformans, pathogenic yeasts, honey sugars, mycotic infections, antifungal resistance, antifungal natural products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review