Cited by 165Artificial Intelligence in EducationTeaching and Learning ProgrammingDigital literacy in education

A differentiated discussion about AI education K-12

Open access
Steinbauer, Gerald, Kandlhofer, Martin, Chklovski, Tara, Heintz, Fredrik, Koenig, Sven·2021·KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

Abstract

AI Education for K-12 and in particular AI literacy gained huge interest recently due to the significantly influence in daily life, society, and economy. In this paper we discuss this topic of early AI education along four dimensions: (1) formal versus informal education, (2) cooperation of researchers in AI and education, (3) the level of education, and (4) concepts and tools.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13218-021-00724-8

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]Touretzky D, Gardner-McCune C, Martin F, Seehorn D (2019) K-12 guidelines for artificial intelligence: what students should know. In: Conference of international society for technology in education (ISTE)
  2. [12]Heinze CA, Haase J, Higgins H (2010) An action research report from a multi-year approach to teaching artificial intelligence at the K-6 level. In: Symposium on educational advances in artificial intelligence
  3. [16]EduAI-K-12 (2020) Workshop on education in artificial intelligence K-12 at IJCAI-19 and AIED-20. http://eduai.ist.tugraz.at/. Accessed 10 Apr 2021
  4. [17]SIGCSE (2021) Technical symposium on computer science education. https://sigcse2021.sigcse.org/. Accessed 1 Mar 2021
  5. [25]Harvey B, Garcia DD, Barnes T, Titterton N, Armendariz D, Segars L, Lemon E, Morris S, Paley J (2013) Snap!(build your own blocks). In: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, p 759

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinbauer, G., Kandlhofer, M., Chklovski, T., Heintz, F., & Koenig, S.
Affiliations
  • Graz University of Technology (AT)
  • Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft (AT)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Steinbauer, Gerald
Venue
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
Published
2021-05-13
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
131-137
ISSN
  • 0933-1875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-1987
OpenAlex
W3161021660
Cited by
160
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3
FWCI
21.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Künstliche Intell. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Graz University of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, K-12 education, AI literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review