Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesNutrition and Health StudiesDoping in Sports

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 113 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Use of Medications and Dietary Supplements by Masters Athletes—A Review

Open access
Harnett, Joanna, Climstein, Mike, Walsh, Joe, Gifford, Janelle·2022·Current Nutrition Reports

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Masters athletes (MA) are generally considered healthier than their sedentary peers. However, the prevalence of chronic conditions in any population increases with age. Treatments involve pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. A substantial proportion of the general population also use dietary supplements (DS). This raises questions about the potential for drug-nutrient interactions which may lead to adverse effects. We sought to determine the potential for drug-nutrient interactions MA may be exposed to by examining the prevalence of chronic conditions treated with medications and their DS use. Recent Findings: Common conditions in MA include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, asthma, osteoarthritis, depression and anxiety. Treatments may involve prescribed medications. Few recent studies were identified on DS use; however, indications are for around 60% prevalence of supplement usage. Summary: The higher prevalence of DS use by MA may result in drug-nutrient interactions that impact the effectiveness and safety of prescribed medications for chronic conditions.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This narrative review examines chronic conditions and dietary supplement (DS) use among masters athletes (MA) and the potential for drug–nutrient interactions with prescribed medications. It concludes that MA generally have lower chronic disease prevalence than general populations, but substantial DS use—around 60%—means interactions warrant caution, monitoring, and disclosure.

Key findings

  • MA generally show lower prevalence of several chronic conditions than general populations. For example, Halar et al. (817 MA) reported lower age–gender-adjusted prevalence of hypertension (4.6% vs 18.7%), hyperlipidemia (1.6% vs 12.1%), type 2 diabetes (1.6% vs 5.5%), asthma (9.9% vs 20.7%), and anxiety-related disorders (9.3% vs 18.1%).
  • Coronary artery findings complicate this picture: among 195 low-to-intermediate-risk MA, 25.7% had high atherosclerotic burden and approximately 6% had obstructive lesions; Merghani et al. found MA had higher plaque prevalence than sedentary controls (p = 0.009), predominantly calcified plaque (72.7%), and male MA had higher atrial fibrillation (sixfold), supraventricular tachycardia (threefold), and non-sustained supraventricular tachycardia (ninefold).
  • DS use is common: Guthrie et al. reported 62% overall supplement use among 1042 US Masters Swimming members, with vitamins (55.8%), calcium (23.1%), glucosamine/chondroitin (11.6%), and coenzyme Q10 (5.4%) most common; Striegel et al. reported 60.5% DS use at the 2004 World Masters Athletic Championships (n = 598).
  • Potential interactions discussed include glucosamine/chondroitin with warfarin (increased INR/bleeding risk), ginkgo biloba with anticoagulants/antiplatelets/SSRIs, CoQ10 with warfarin/antiplatelets/statins/antihypertensives/diabetes medications, red yeast rice with statins/CYP3A4 inhibitors, calcium with bisphosphonates/antibiotics, and creatine plus caffeine in Parkinson disease (faster progression). Aznar-Lou et al. found one in two of 820 people taking tetracyclines, thiazides, or angiotensin II receptor blockers were at risk of a DS interaction; the authors’ own observations at the 2017 Australian Masters Games and 2018 Pan Pacific Masters Games found almost 50% of MA reported taking up to 16 DS/sports foods and almost 50% used two or more therapies including medications.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review examining literature from the last decade on chronic conditions in MA and DS use, followed by discussion of possible drug–nutrient interactions.
  • Data/sample: no primary sample; synthesizes prior survey and clinical studies, including World Masters Games, Australian Masters Games, Pan Pacific Masters Games, and US Masters Swimming participants, plus a representative US population study (n = 820) and case reports.
  • Analysis: narrative/descriptive synthesis and mechanistic discussion; no meta-analysis or formal risk-of-bias assessment is described.

Limitations

  • The paper states that literature is scarce regarding prevalence of chronic conditions and DS use in the broader MA population; few recent DS studies were identified; Guthrie et al.’s results cannot be generalised to all MA, and only supplements comparable to NHANES were collected; the authors’ own AMG/PPMG data lacked information on concurrent administration; further research is needed to establish stronger causal associations.
  • The paper states that no large-scale, longitudinal study has investigated whether MA are immune from developing chronic diseases and how those conditions are managed.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it reports no systematic search strategy or formal quality appraisal; interaction evidence is often theoretical, from case reports, or from non-MA populations, limiting causal inference.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13668-022-00398-0

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 Radar plot of prevalence of chronic conditions in MA participating in the 2009 World Masters Games as compared to the Australian general population (modified with permission from reference [32•])
Fig. 1 Radar plot of prevalence of chronic conditions in MA participating in the 2009 World Masters Games as compared to the Australian general population (modified with permission from reference [32•])CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 1 Not valid · 80 Not checked · 6 Own results and interpretations

37 more claims

Create a free account to see all 87 claims and to verify the 84 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 30
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Climstein M, Walsh J, Heazlewood I, DeBeliso M. Endurance masters athletes: a model of successful ageing with clinically superior BMI? The Sport Journal. 2019;21(April):1–11.
  2. Walsh J, Climstein M, Heazelwood I,DeBeliso M, Adams K, Burke S. Body mass index of masters basketball players. Medicina Sportiva, J Romanian Sports Med Soc. 2013;7:1700–5.
  3. Walsh J, Climstein M, Heazlewood IT, Burke S, Kettunen J, Adams K, DeBeliso M. Improved body mass index classification for football code masters athletes: a comparison to the Australian national population. Int J Biol Med Sci. 2011;1(1):37–40.
  4. Walsh J, Heazlewood IT, DeBeliso M, Climstein M. Comparison of obesity prevalence across 28 world masters games sports. Sport Sci. 2018;11(1):30–6.
  5. DeBeliso M, Walsh J, Climstein M, Heazlewood IT, Kettunen J, Sevene T, Adams K. World Masters Games: North American participant medical and health history survey. Sport J. 2014;55(17):1–9.
  6. Climstein M, Walsh J, Heazlewood T, Burke S, Kettunen J, Adams K, DeBeliso M. Incidence of chronic disease and lipid profile in veteran rugby athletes. Int J Biol Med Sci. 2011;1(1):41.
  7. Chalmers J, Halar F, O'Connor H, Prvan T, Climstein M, Stuart-Smith W, Reaburn P, Gifford J. Medication and dietary supplement use in masters athletes; prevalence and safety. Sports Medicine New Zealand Conference 2019; 2019 31 October-2 November; Dunedin. Dunedin: Sports Medicine Inc; 2019.
  8. Coxeter PD, Duke CC, Roufogalis B, McLachlan AJ. Ginkgo biloba interactions. Journal of Complementary Medicine: CM, The. 2003;2(3):62–4.

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Harnett, J., Climstein, M., Walsh, J., & Gifford, J.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Gifford, Janelle
Venue
Current Nutrition Reports
Published
2022-05-30
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
253-262
ISSN
2161-3311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281918145
Cited by
12
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Current Nutrition Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
Keywords
masters athletes, dietary supplements, drug-nutrient interactions, medication use, chronic disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, depression, anxiety, asthma, drug safety
MeSH terms
Humans, Prevalence, Dietary Supplements, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.