Cited by 25Obesity, Physical Activity, DietPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Commercial weight loss programs in the management of obesity: an update.

Open access
Laudenslager, Marci, Chaudhry, Zoobia W., Rajagopal, Selvi, Clynes, Sasha, Gudzune, Kimberly A.·2021·Current Obesity Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Comprehensive lifestyle programs are cornerstones of obesity management, but clinician referrals may be limited by program availability. Commercial weight loss programs may be an alternative, but clinicians may be unaware of their efficacy and safety. This review describes the evidence for commercial programs, particularly 12-month weight loss, among individuals with obesity.Recent findings Several programs are concordant with evidence-based recommendations (i.e., lower-calorie diet, increased physical activity, and behavioral strategies). Among the guideline-concordant programs, National Diabetes Prevention Program, WW, Jenny Craig, Medifast, and OPTIFAST have demonstrated 12-month weight loss efficacy and safety. While other programs show promise, more evidence is needed before clinician referral may be recommended. Clinical practice guidelines support referrals to commercial weight loss programs that have peer-reviewed evidence to support their efficacy and safety. Clinicians should consider the available evidence, patient preference, and cost when considering referrals to these programs for weight management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13679-021-00428-y

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laudenslager, M., Chaudhry, Z. W., Rajagopal, S., Clynes, S., & Gudzune, K. A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Laudenslager, Marci
Venue
Current Obesity Reports
Published
2021-02-20
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
90-99
ISSN
2162-4968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133455239
Cited by
25
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Obesity Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32hl007180-45)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32-HL-007180)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH115842)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
commercial weight loss programs, obesity treatment, lifestyle intervention, National Diabetes Prevention Program, Weight Watchers, OPTIFAST, clinician referral, hypocaloric diet, behavioral weight management
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diet, Reducing, Humans, Life Style, Obesity, Referral and Consultation, Weight Loss, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review