Cited by 139Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet and metabolism studiesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Weight Loss, Glycemic Control, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Response to Differential Diet Composition in a Weight Loss Program in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Rock, Cheryl L., Flatt, Shirley W., Pakiz, Bilge, Taylor, Kenneth S., Leone, Angela F., Brelje, Kerrin, Heath, Dennis D., Quintana, Elizabeth L. +1 more·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether a weight loss program promotes greater weight loss, glycemic control, and improved cardiovascular disease risk factors compared with control conditions and whether there is a differential response to higher versus lower carbohydrate intake. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial at two university medical centers enrolled 227 overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes and assigned them to parallel in-person diet and exercise counseling, with prepackaged foods in a planned menu during the initial phase, or to usual care (UC; two weight loss counseling sessions and monthly contacts). RESULTS: Relative weight loss was 7.4% (95% CI 5.7–9.2%), 9.0% (7.1–10.9%), and 2.5% (1.3–3.8%) for the lower fat, lower carbohydrate, and UC groups (P < 0.001 intervention effect). Glycemic control markers and triglyceride levels were lower in the intervention groups compared with UC group at 1 year (fasting glucose 141 [95% CI 133–149] vs. 159 [144–174] mg/dL, P = 0.023; hemoglobin A1c 6.9% [6.6–7.1%] vs. 7.5% [7.1–7.9%] or 52 [49–54] vs. 58 [54–63] mmol/mol, P = 0.001; triglycerides 148 [134–163] vs. 204 [173–234] mg/dL, P < 0.001). The lower versus higher carbohydrate groups maintained lower hemoglobin A1c (6.6% [95% CI 6.3–6.8%] vs. 7.2% [6.8–7.5%] or 49 [45–51] vs. 55 [51–58] mmol/mol) at 1 year (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The weight loss program resulted in greater weight loss and improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc13-2900

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rock, C. L., Flatt, S. W., Pakiz, B., Taylor, K. S., Leone, A. F., Brelje, K., Heath, D. D., Quintana, E. L., & Sherwood, N. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Rock, Cheryl L.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-05-10
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1573-1580
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2092955095
Cited by
139
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA023100)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, weight loss, glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, carbohydrate intake, low-carbohydrate diet, low-fat diet, diet and exercise counseling, overweight and obesity, HbA1c, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Weight Loss, Case-Control Studies, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Overweight, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Young Adult, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review