The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peptides as drug delivery vehicles across biological barriers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Peptides have several pros, such as simplicity, low cost, chemical variety, biocompatibility, and stimulus responsiveness.114,115”
From Current Advances in Chitosan Nanoparticles Based Oral Drug Delivery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [114]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RGD AND OTHER RECOGNITION SEQUENCES FOR INTEGRINS
Ruoslahti, E. (1996) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.697 · Cited by 3,191 · cited 4×
“The affinity of NGR for integrins is about three orders of magnitude less than that of RGD peptides (Ruoslahti 1996).”
InfluentialDrug penetration in solid tumours
Minchinton, A. I., & Tannock, I. F. (2006) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1893 · Cited by 2,805
High Interstitial Fluid Pressure - an Obstacle in Cancer Therapy
Heldin, C.-H., Rubin, K., Pietras, K., & Östman, A. (2004) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1456 · Cited by 2,222
Approaches for enhancing oral bioavailability of peptides and proteins
Renukuntla, J., Vadlapudi, A. D., Patel, A., Boddu, S. H. S., & Mitra, A. K. (2013) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.030 · Cited by 681
Is the oral route possible for peptide and protein drug delivery?
Morishita, M., & Peppas, N. A. (2006) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.08.005 · Cited by 515 · cited 12×
“Drugs and drug delivery systems encounter several physical, chemical and biologic barriers after oral administration en route to their pharmacological target site of action: acidic and enzymatic degradation in the stomach and intestine, mucosal barriers, and limited permeation across the intestinal epithelium (Bernkop…”
InfluentialAdhesion events in angiogenesis
Eliceiri, B. P., & Cheresh, D. A. (2001) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00252-0 · Cited by 287
Research works printed but not linked: 187
- AC’t Hoen PAC, Jirka SMG, Ten Broeke BR et al (2012) Phage display screening without repetitious selection rounds. Anal Biochem 421:622–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2011.11.005 · DOI
- Agarwal V (2001) Current status of the oral delivery of insulin. Pharm Technol 25:76–90
- Agemy L (2011) Targeted nanoparticle enhanced proapoptotic peptide as potential therapy for glioblastoma. Proc Nat Acad Sci 108:17450–17455. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114518108 · DOI
- Aguirre TAS, Teijeiro-Osorio D, Rosa M et al (2016) Current status of selected oral peptide technologies in advanced preclinical development and in clinical trials. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 106:223–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.004 · DOI
- Akerman ME, Chan WCW, Laakkonen P et al (2002) Nanocrystal targeting in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12617–12621. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152463399 · DOI
- Alberici L, Roth L, Sugahara KN et al (2013) De novo design of a tumor-penetrating peptide. Cancer Res 73:804–812. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1668 · DOI
- Alitalo K, Carmeliet P (2002) Molecular mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in health and disease. Cancer Cell 1:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00051-X · DOI
- Arap W (1998) Cancer treatment by targeted drug delivery to tumor vasculature in a mouse model. Science 279:377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5349.377 · DOI
- Bagri A, Tessier-Lavigne M, Watts RJ (2009) Neuropilins in tumor biology. Clin Cancer Res 15:1860–1864. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0563 · DOI
- Bastian SEP, Walton PE, Ballard FJ, Belford DA (1999) Transport of IGF-I across epithelial cell monolayers. J Endocrinol 162:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1620361 · DOI
- Bernkop-Schnurch A (1998) The use of inhibitory agents to overcome the enzymatic barrier to perorally administered therapeutic peptides and proteins. J Control Release 52:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00204-6 · DOI
- Bertrand Y, Currie J-C, Poirier J et al (2011) Influence of glioma tumour microenvironment on the transport of ANG1005 via low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1. Br J Cancer 105:1697–1707. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.427 · DOI · Paper page
- Bi Y, Liu L, Lu Y et al (2016) T7 Peptide-functionalized PEG-PLGA micelles loaded with carmustine for targeting therapy of glioma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:27465–27473. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b05572 · DOI
- Boegh M, García-Díaz M, Müllertz A, Nielsen HM (2015) Steric and interactive barrier properties of intestinal mucus elucidated by particle diffusion and peptide permeation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 95:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.01.014 · DOI
- Boohaker RJ, Lee MW, Vishnubhotla P et al (2012) The use of therapeutic peptides to target and to kill cancer cells. Curr Med Chem 19:3794–3804. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712801661004 · DOI
- Camenisch G, Alsenz J, Van De Waterbeemd H, Folkers G (1998) Estimation of permeability by passive diffusion through Caco-2 cell monolayers using the drugs lipophilicity and molecular weight. Eur J Pharm Sci 6:313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(97)10019-7 · DOI
- Ceramide E, Erdreich-epstein A, Shimada H et al (2000) Integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 are expressed by endothelium of high-risk neuroblastoma and their inhibition is associated with increased. Cancer Res 60:712–721
- Chen C, Duan Z, Yuan Y et al (2017) Peptide-22 and cyclic RGD functionalized liposomes for glioma targeting drug delivery overcoming BBB and BBTB. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:5864–5873. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b15831 · DOI
- Connor Y, Tekleab S, Nandakumar S et al (2015) Physical nanoscale conduit-mediated communication between tumour cells and the endothelium modulates endothelial phenotype. Nat Commun 6:8671. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9671 · DOI
- Cui Y, Zhang M, Zeng F et al (2016) Dual-targeting magnetic PLGA nanoparticles for codelivery of paclitaxel and curcumin for brain tumor therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:32159–32169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10175 · DOI
- Cun X, Chen J, Ruan S et al (2015) A novel strategy through combining irgd peptide with tumor-microenvironment-responsive and multistage nanoparticles for deep tumor penetration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:27458–27466. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b09391 · DOI
- Curnis F, Gasparri A, Sacchi A et al (2004) Coupling tumor necrosis factor-alpha with alphaV integrin ligands improves its antineoplastic activity. Cancer Res 64:565–571. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-03-1753 doi · DOI
- Curnis F, Sacchi A, Gasparri A et al (2008) Isoaspartate-glycine-arginine: a new tumor vasculature-targeting motif. Cancer Res 68:7073–7082. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1272 · DOI
- Dai W, Fan Y, Zhang H et al (2014) A comprehensive study of iRGD-modified liposomes with improved chemotherapeutic efficacy on B16 melanoma. Drug Deliv 7544:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2014.903580 · DOI
- De G, Ko J-K, Tan T et al (2014) Amphipathic tail-anchoring peptide is a promising therapeutic agent for prostate cancer treatment. Oncotarget 5:7734–7747. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2301 · DOI
- Demeule M, Régina A, Ché C et al (2008) Identification and design of peptides as a new drug delivery system for the brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 324:1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.107.131318 · DOI
- Díaz-Perlas C, Sánchez-Navarro M, Teixidó M, Giralt E (2016) Phage display as a tool to discover BBB-shuttle peptides: panning against a human blood-brain barrier cellular model. J Pept Sci 22:S107. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.22928 · DOI
- Du R, Zhong T, Zhang WQ et al (2014) Antitumor effect of iRGD-modified liposomes containing conjugated linoleic acid-paclitaxel (CLA-PTX) on B16-F10 melanoma. Int J Nanomed 9:3091–3105. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S65664 · DOI
- Duerr DM, White SJ, Schluesener HJ (2004) Identification of peptide sequences that induce the transport of phage across the gastrointestinal mucosal barrier. J Virol Methods 116:177–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.11.012 · DOI
- Fan X, Venegas R, Fey R et al (2007) An in vivo approach to structure activity relationship analysis of peptide ligands. Pharm Res 24:868–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9238-z · DOI
- Fievez V, Plapied L, Plaideau C et al (2010) In vitro identification of targeting-ligands of human M cells by phage display. Int J Pharm 394:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.04.023 · DOI
- Fittipaldi A, Giacca M (2005) Transcellular protein transduction using the Tat protein of HIV-1. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.10.011 · DOI
- Fogal V, Zhang L, Krajewski S, Ruoslahti E (2008) Mitochondrial/cell-surface protein p32/gC1qR as a molecular target in tumor cells and tumor stroma. Cancer Res 68:7210–7218. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6752 · DOI
- Frey A, Giannasca KT, Weltzin R et al (1996) Role of the glycocalyx in regulating access of microparticles to apical plasma membranes of intestinal epithelial cells: implications for microbial attachment and oral vaccine targeting. J Exp Med 184:1045–1059. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.184.3.1045 · DOI · Paper page
- Gaillard PJ, Appeldoorn CCM, Dorland R et al (2014) Pharmacokinetics, brain delivery, and efficacy in brain tumor-bearing mice of glutathione pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (2B3-101). PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082331 · DOI
- Gao H, Qian J, Cao S et al (2012) Precise glioma targeting of and penetration by aptamer and peptide dual-functioned nanoparticles. Biomaterials 33:5115–5123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.058 · DOI
- Gao H, Yang Z, Zhang S et al (2014) Study and evaluation of mechanisms of dual targeting drug delivery system with tumor microenvironment assays compared with normal assays. Acta Biomater 10:858–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.003 · DOI
- Georgieva JV, Brinkhuis RP, Stojanov K et al (2012) Peptide-mediated blood-brain barrier transport of polymersomes. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:8339–8342. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201202001 · DOI
- Goldberg M, Gomez-Orellana I (2003) Challenges for the oral delivery of macromolecules. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1067 · DOI
- Green M, Loewenstein PM (1988) Autonomous functional domains of chemically synthesized human immunodeficiency virus tat trans-activator protein. Cell 55:1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90262-0 · DOI
- Gu G, Gao X, Hu Q et al (2013) The influence of the penetrating peptide iRGD on the effect of paclitaxel-loaded MT1-AF7p-conjugated nanoparticles on glioma cells. Biomaterials 34:5138–5148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.036 · DOI
- Guixer B, Arroyo X, Belda I et al (2016) Chemically synthesized peptide libraries as a new source of BBB shuttles. Use of mass spectrometry for peptide identification. J Pept Sci 22:577–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.2900 · DOI
- Hambley TW WNH (2009) Is anticancer drug development heading in the right direction?. Cancer Res 69:1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3786 · DOI
- Hamzeh-Mivehroud M, Mahmoudpour A, Rezazadeh H, Dastmalchi S (2008) Non-specific translocation of peptide-displaying bacteriophage particles across the gastrointestinal barrier. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 70:577–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.06.005 · DOI
- Hanahan D, Folkman J (1996) Patterns and emerging mechanisms review of the angiogenic switchduring tumorigenesis. Cell 86:353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80108-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Higgins LM, Lambkin I, Donnelly G et al (2004) In vivo phage display to identify M cell-targeting ligands. Pharm Res 21:695–705. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000022418.80506.9a · DOI
- Hu Gu G, Liu Z, Jiang M, Kang T, Miao D, Tu Y, Pang Z, Song Q, Yao L, Xia H, Chen H, Jiang X, Gaob X, Chen JQ (2013) F3 peptide-functionalized PEG-PLA nanoparticles co-administrated with tLyP-1 peptide for anti-glioma drug delivery. Biomaterials 34:1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.048 · DOI
- Hwang SR, Byun Y (2014) Advances in oral macromolecular drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 11:1955–1967. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.945420 · DOI
- Jain RK (1988) Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review. Cancer Res 48:2641–2658. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.241 · DOI
- Jain RK (1999) Transport of molecules, particles, and cells in solid tumors. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 1:241–263. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.241 · DOI
- Jain RK, Joshi R, Byrav DP et al (2001) Delivery of molecular and cellular medicine to solid tumors1PII of original article: S0169–409X(97)00027 – 6. The article was originally published. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 26 (1997) 71–90.1. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 46:149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00131-9 · DOI
- Järver P, Mäger I, Langel Ü (2010) In vivo biodistribution and efficacy of peptide mediated delivery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 31:528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2010.07.006 · DOI
- Jiang T, Olson ES, Nguyen QT et al (2004) Tumor imaging by means of proteolytic activation of cell-penetrating peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17867–17872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408191101 · DOI
- Jin Y, Song Y, Zhu X et al (2012) Biomaterials Goblet cell-targeting nanoparticles for oral insulin delivery and the in fl uence of mucus on insulin transport. Biomaterials 33:1573–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.075 · DOI · Paper page
- Kamei N, Morishita M, Eda Y et al (2008a) Usefulness of cell-penetrating peptides to improve intestinal insulin absorption. J Control Release 132:21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.08.001 · DOI
- Kamei N, Morishita M, Ehara J, Takayama K (2008b) Permeation characteristics of oligoarginine through intestinal epithelium and its usefulness for intestinal peptide drug delivery. J Control Release 131:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.07.016 · DOI
- Kamei N, Morishita M, Takayama K (2009) Importance of intermolecular interaction on the improvement of intestinal therapeutic peptide/protein absorption using cell-penetrating peptides. J Control Release 136:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.02.015 · DOI
- Kang SK, Woo JH, Kim MK et al (2008) Identification of a peptide sequence that improves transport of macromolecules across the intestinal mucosal barrier targeting goblet cells. J Biotechnol 135:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.01.021 · DOI
- Kang T, Jiang M, Jiang D et al (2015) Enhancing glioblastoma-specific penetration by functionalization of nanoparticles with an iron-mimic peptide targeting transferrin/transferrin receptor complex. Mol Pharm 12:2947–2961. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00222 · DOI
- Kannan R, Chakrabarti R, Tang D et al (2000) GSH transport in human cerebrovascular endothelial cells and human astrocytes: evidence for luminal localization of Na+-dependent GSH transport in HCEC. Brain Res 852:374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(99)02184-8 · DOI
- Karmali PP, Kotamraju VR, Kastantin M et al (2009) Targeting of albumin-embedded paclitaxel nanoparticles to tumors. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biol Med 5:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2008.07.007 · DOI
- Kauffman B, Fuselier T, He J, Wimley W (2015) Mechanism matters: a taxonomy of cell penetrating peptides. Trends Biochem Sci 40:749–764. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2015.1094689.Post-Traumatic · DOI
- Kenngott EE, Cole S, Hein WR et al (2016) Identification of targeting peptides for mucosal delivery in sheep and mice. Mol Pharm 13:202–210. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00635 · DOI
- Khafagy ES, Morishita M (2012) Oral biodrug delivery using cell-penetrating peptide. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.12.014 · DOI
- Kinsella JM, Jimenez RE, Karmali PP et al (2011) X-ray computed tomography imaging of breast cancer by using targeted peptide-labeled bismuth sulfide nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:12308–12311. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201104507 · DOI
- Koivunen E, Wang B, Ruoslahti E (1995) Phage libraries displaying cyclic peptides with different ring sizes: ligand specificities of the RGD-directed integrins. Biotechnology 13:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0395-265 · DOI
- Komin A, Russell LM, Hristova KA, Searson PC (2017) Peptide-based strategies for enhanced cell uptake, transcellular transport, and circulation: mechanisms and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 110–111:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.002 · DOI
- Kompella UB, Lee VHL (2001) Delivery systems for penetration enhancement of peptide and protein drugs: design considerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 46:211–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00137-X · DOI
- Laakkonen P, Porkka K, Hoffman JA, Ruoslahti E (2002) A tumor-homing peptide with a targeting specificity related to lymphatic vessels. Nat Med 8:751–755. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm720 · DOI
- Langguth P, Bohner V, Heizmann J et al (1997) The challenge of proteolytic enzymes in intestinal peptide delivery. J Control Release 46:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(96)01586-6 · DOI
- Larhed AW, Artursson P, Gråsjö J, Björk E (1997) Diffusion of drugs in native and purified gastrointestinal mucus. J Pharm Sci 86:660–665. https://doi.org/10.1021/js960503w · DOI
- Larhed AW, Artursson P, Björk E (1998) The influence of intestinal mucus components on the diffusion of drugs. Pharm Res 15:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011948703571 · DOI
- Lee VHL, Yamamoto A (1989) Penetration and enzymatic barriers to peptide and protein absorption. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 4:171–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-409X(89)90018-5 · DOI
- Lee JH, Engler JA, Collawn JF, Moore BA (2001) Receptor mediated uptake of peptides that bind the human transferrin receptor. Eur J Biochem 268:2004–2012. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02073.x · DOI
- Li J, Feng L, Fan L et al (2011) Targeting the brain with PEG-PLGA nanoparticles modified with phage-displayed peptides. Biomaterials 32:4943–4950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.031 · DOI
- Li J, Zhang Q, Pang Z et al (2012) Identification of peptide sequences that target to the brain using in vivo phage display. Amino Acids 42:2373–2381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-011-0979-y · DOI
- Li J, Zhang C, Li J et al (2013) Brain delivery of NAP with PEG-PLGA nanoparticles modified with phage display peptides. Pharm Res 30:1813–1823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1025-4 · DOI
- Li M, Tang Z, Zhang D et al (2015a) Doxorubicin-loaded polysaccharide nanoparticles suppress the growth of murine colorectal carcinoma and inhibit the metastasis of murine mammary carcinoma in rodent models. Biomaterials 51:161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.002 · DOI
- Li X, Wang C, Liang R et al (2015b) The glucose-lowering potential of exenatide delivered orally via goblet cell-targeting nanoparticles. Pharm Res 32:1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-014-1513-1 · DOI
- Li Y, Zheng X, Gong M, Zhang J (2016) Delivery of a peptide-drug conjugate targeting the blood brain barrier improved the efficacy of paclitaxel against glioma. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12708 · DOI
- Liang JF, Yang VC (2005) Insulin-cell penetrating peptide hybrids with improved intestinal absorption efficiency. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 335:734–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.142 · DOI
- Lindqvist A, Rip J, Van Kregten J et al (2016) In vivo functional evaluation of increased brain delivery of the opioid peptide DAMGO by glutathione-PEGylated liposomes. Pharm Res 33:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-015-1774-3 · DOI
- Lindsay MA (2002) Peptide-mediated cell delivery: application in protein target validation. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2:587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-4892(02)00199-6 · DOI
- Liu GW, Livesay BR, Kacherovsky NA et al (2015) Efficient identification of murine M2 macrophage peptide targeting ligands by phage display and next-generation sequencing. Bioconjug Chem 26:1811–1817. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00344 · DOI
- Lundquist P, Artursson P (2016) Oral absorption of peptides and nanoparticles across the human intestine: opportunities, limitations and studies in human tissues. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 106:256–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.07.007 · DOI
- Ma H, Yu P, Shen S, Xu B (2014) A dual functional fluorescent probe for glioma imaging mediated by BBB penetration and glioma cell targeting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 449:44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.04.148 · DOI
- Mahmood A, Prüfert F, Efiana NA et al (2016) Cell-penetrating self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) for oral gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 13:1503–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2016.1213236 · DOI
- Malcor JD, Payrot N, David M et al (2012) Chemical optimization of new ligands of the low-density lipoprotein receptor as potential vectors for central nervous system targeting. J Med Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm2014919 · DOI
- Matochko WL, Derda R (2015) Next-generation sequencing of phage-displayed peptide libraries. Methods Mol Biol 1248:249–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2020-4_17 · DOI
- Maussang D, Rip J, van Kregten J et al (2016) Glutathione conjugation dose-dependently increases brain-specific liposomal drug delivery in vitro and in vivo. Drug Discov Today Technol 20:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2016.09.003 · DOI
- Mohamadzadeh M, Duong T, Sandwick SJ et al (2009) Dendritic cell targeting of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen expressed by Lactobacillus acidophilus protects mice from lethal challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:4331–4336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900029106 · DOI
- Morishita M, Morishita I, Takayama K et al (1993) Site-dependent effect of aprotinin, sodium caprate, Na2EDTA and sodium glycocholate on intestinal absorption of insulin. Biol Pharm Bull 16:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.16.68 · DOI
- Morishita M, Kamei N, Ehara J et al (2007) A novel approach using functional peptides for efficient intestinal absorption of insulin. J Control Release 118:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.12.022 · DOI
- Moroz E, Matoori S, Leroux JC (2016) Oral delivery of macromolecular drugs: where we are after almost 100 years of attempts. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 101:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.01.010 · DOI
- Murphy EA, Majeti BK, Barnes LA et al (2008) Nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery to tumor vasculature suppresses metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9343–9348. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803728105 · DOI
- Nakase I, Niwa M, Takeuchi T et al (2004) Cellular uptake of arginine-rich peptides: Roles for macropinocytosis and actin rearrangement. Mol Ther 10:1011–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.08.010 · DOI
- Nguyen J, Hossain SS, Cooke JRN et al (2017) Flow arrest intra-arterial delivery of small TAT-decorated and neutral micelles to gliomas. J Neurooncol 133:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2429-5 · DOI
- Nielsen EJB, Yoshida S, Kamei N et al (2014) In vivo proof of concept of oral insulin delivery based on a co-administration strategy with the cell-penetrating peptide penetratin. J Control Release 189:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.022 · DOI
- Nielsen DS, Shepherd NE, Xu W et al (2017) Orally absorbed cyclic peptides. Chem Rev 117:8094–8128. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00838 · DOI
- O’Neill MJ, Bourre L, Melgar S, O’Driscoll CM (2011) Intestinal delivery of non-viral gene therapeutics: physiological barriers and preclinical models. Drug Discov Today 16:203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2011.01.003 · DOI
- O’Sullivan CC, Lindenberg M, Bryla C et al (2016) ANG1005 for breast cancer brain metastases: correlation between 18F-FLT–PET after first cycle and MRI in response assessment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 160:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3972-z · DOI
- Olive KP, Jacobetz MA, Davidson CJ et al (2009) Inhibition of hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 324:1457–1461. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171362 · DOI · Paper page
- Paasonen L, Sharma S, Braun GB et al (2016) New p32/gC1qR ligands for targeted tumor drug delivery. ChemBioChem 17:570–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201500564 · DOI
- Pang H-B, Braun GB, Friman T et al (2014) An endocytosis pathway initiated through neuropilin-1 and regulated by nutrient availability. Nat Commun 5:4904. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5904 · DOI
- Pardridge WM (2006) Molecular Trojan horses for blood-brain barrier drug delivery. Curr Opin Pharmacol 6:494–500 · DOI
- Pardridge WM (2012) Drug transport across the blood–brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32:1959–1972. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2012.126 · DOI · Paper page
- Pasqualini R, Ruoslahti E (1996) Organ targeting In vivo using phage display peptide libraries. Nature 380:364–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/380364a0 · DOI
- Pasqualini R, Koivunen E, Ruoslahti E (1997) Alpha v integrins as receptors for tumor targeting by circulating ligands. Nat Biotechnol 15:542–546. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0798-822 · DOI
- Pasqualini R, Koivunen E, Kain R et al (2000) Aminopeptidase N is a receptor for tumor-homing peptides and a target for inhibiting angiogenesis. Cancer Res 60:722–727
- Pauletti GM, Gangwar S, Knipp GT et al (1996) Structural requirements for intestinal absorption of peptide drugs. J Control Release 41:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-3659(96)01352-1 · DOI
- Pelaseyed T, Bergström JH, Gustafsson JK et al (2014) The mucus and mucins of the goblet cells and enterocytes provide the first defense line of the gastrointestinal tract and interact with the immune system. Immunol Rev 260:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12182 · DOI · Paper page
- Peterson LW, Artis D (2014) Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol 14:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3608 · DOI
- Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E (1984) Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule. Nature 309:30–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/309030a0 · DOI
- Porkka K, Laakkonen P, Hoffman JA et al (2002) A fragment of the HMGN2 protein homes to the nuclei of tumor cells and tumor endothelial cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7444–7449. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062189599 · DOI
- Prados MD, Schold SC Jr, Fine HA et al (2003) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study of RMP-7 in combination with carboplatin administered intravenously for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma. Neuro Oncol 5:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1215/S1522851702000340 · DOI
- Puig-Saus C, Rojas L, Laborda E et al (2014) iRGD tumor-penetrating peptide-modified oncolytic adenovirus shows enhanced tumor transduction, intratumoral dissemination and antitumor efficacy. Gene Ther 21:767–774. https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2014.52 · DOI
- Qosa H, Mohamed LA, Alqahtani S et al (2016) Transporters as drug targets in neurological diseases. Clin Pharmacol Ther 100:441–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.435 · DOI
- Regina A, Demeule M, Tripathy S et al (2015) ANG4043, a novel brain-penetrant peptide-mAb conjugate, is efficacious against HER2-positive intracranial tumors in mice. Mol Cancer Ther 14:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0399 · DOI · Paper page
- Régina A, Demeule M, Ché C et al (2008) Antitumour activity of ANG1005, a conjugate between paclitaxel and the new brain delivery vector Angiopep-2. Br J Pharmacol 155:185–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjp.2008.260 · DOI
- Ren Y, Cheung HW, von Maltzhan G et al (2012) Targeted tumor-penetrating siRNA nanocomplexes for credentialing the ovarian cancer oncogene ID4. Sci Transl Med 4:147ra112–147ra112. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003778 · DOI
- Richard JP, Melikov K, Vives E et al (2003) Cell-penetrating peptides: a reevaluation of the mechanism of cellular uptake. J Biol Chem 278:585–590. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209548200 · DOI
- Roth L, Agemy L, Kotamraju VR et al (2012) Transtumoral targeting enabled by a novel neuropilin-binding peptide. Oncogene 31:3754–3763. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2011.537 · DOI
- Rotman M, Welling MM, Bunschoten A et al (2015) Enhanced glutathione PEGylated liposomal brain delivery of an anti-amyloid single domain antibody fragment in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. J Control Release 203:40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.012 · DOI
- Rousselle C, Clair P, Temsamani J, Scherrmann JM(2002).Improved brain delivery of benzylpenicillin with a peptide-vector-mediated strategy. J Drug Target. 10(4):309–315 · DOI
- Rubas W, Cromwell MEM, Shahrokh Z et al (1996) Flux measurements across Caco-2 monolayers may predict transport in human large intestinal tissue. J Pharm Sci 85:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1021/js950267+ · DOI
- Ruoslahti E (2002) Specialization of tumour vasculature. Nat Rev Cancer 2:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc724 · DOI
- Ruoslahti E (2003) The RGD story: a personal account. Matrix Biol 22:459–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0945-053X(03)00083-0 · DOI
- Ruoslahti E (2012) Peptides as targeting elements and tissue penetration devices for nanoparticles. Adv Mater 24:3747–3756. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200454 · DOI
- Ruoslahti E (2017) Tumor penetrating peptides for improved drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 110–111:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.008 · DOI
- Ruoslahti E, Bhatia SN, Sailor MJ (2010) Targeting of drugs and nanoparticles to tumors. J Cell Biol 188:759–768. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200910104 · DOI
- Sánchez-Navarro M, Teixidó M, Giralt E (2017) Jumping hurdles: peptides able to overcome biological barriers. Acc Chem Res. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00204 · DOI
- Sato AK, Viswanathan M, Kent RB, Wood CR (2006) Therapeutic peptides: technological advances driving peptides into development. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:638–642 · DOI
- Schmithals C, Köberle V, Korkusuz H et al (2015) Improving drug penetrability with iRGD leverages the therapeutic response to sorafenib and doxorubicin in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 75:3147–3154. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0395 · DOI
- Schwarze SR (1999) In vivo protein transduction: delivery of a biologically active protein into the mouse. Science 285:1569–1573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5433.1569 · DOI
- Scott Swenson E, Curatolo WJ (1992) (C) Means to enhance penetration. (2) Intestinal permeability enhancement for proteins, peptides and other polar drugs: mechanisms and potential toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 8:39–92 · DOI
- Sha H, Zou Z, Xin K et al (2015) Tumor-penetrating peptide fused EGFR single-domain antibody enhances cancer drug penetration into 3D multicellular spheroids and facilitates effective gastric cancer therapy. J Control Release 200:188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.039 · DOI
- Shah RB, Ahsan F, Khan MA (2002) Oral delivery of proteins: progress and prognostication. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 19:135–169. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v19.i2.20 · DOI
- Shen J, Meng Q, Sui H et al (2014) IRGD conjugated TPGS mediates codelivery of paclitaxel and survivin shRNA for the reversal of lung cancer resistance. Mol Pharm 11:2579–2591. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp400576f · DOI
- Shi Y, Jiang X, Zhang L et al (2017) Endothelium-targeted overexpression of heat shock protein 27 ameliorates blood-brain barrier disruption after ischemic brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(7), E1243–E1252 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1621174114 · DOI
- Smith MW, Al-Jayyoussi G, Gumbleton M (2012) Peptide sequences mediating tropism to intact blood-brain barrier: an in vivo biodistribution study using phage display. Peptides 38:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2012.06.019 · DOI
- Staquicini FI, Ozawa MG, Moya CA et al (2011) Systemic combinatorial peptide selection yields a non-canonical iron-mimicry mechanism for targeting tumors in a mouse model of human glioblastoma. J Clin Invest 121:161–173. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI44798 · DOI
- Sugahara KN, Teesalu T, Karmali PP et al (2009) Tissue-penetrating delivery of compounds and nanoparticles into tumors. Cancer Cell 16:510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.013 · DOI
- Sugahara KN, Teesalu T, Karmali PP et al (2010) Coadministration of a tumor-penetrating peptdei enhances the efficacy of cancer drugs. Science 328:1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 · DOI
- Teesalu T, Sugahara KN, Kotamraju VR, Ruoslahti E (2009) C-end rule peptides mediate neuropilin-1-dependent cell, vascular, and tissue penetration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:16157–16162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908201106 · DOI · Paper page
- Teesalu T, Sugahara KN, Ruoslahti E (2013) Tumor-penetrating peptides. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00216 · DOI
- Teixidó M, Belda I, Zurita E et al (2005) Evolutionary combinatorial chemistry, a novel tool for SAR studies on peptide transport across the blood-brain barrier. Part 2. Design, synthesis and evaluation of a first generation of peptides. J Pept Sci 11:789–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.679 · DOI
- Tian Y, Li S, Song J et al (2014) A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials 35:2383–2390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.083 · DOI
- Toome K, Willmore AM, Paiste P et al (2017) Ratiometric in vivo auditioning of targeted silver nanoparticles. Nanoscale. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR04056C · DOI
- Tozaki H, Odoriba T, Iseki T et al (1998) Use of protease inhibitors to improve calcitonin absorption from the small and large intestine in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol 50:913–920 · DOI
- Tremmel R, Uhl P, Helm F, Wupperfeld D et al (2016) Delivery of copper-chelating trientine (TETA) to the central nervous system by surface modified liposomes. Int J Pharm 512(1):87–95 · DOI
- Tuma PL, Hubbard AL (2003) Transcytosis: crossing cellular barriers. Physiol Rev 83:871–932. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00001.2003 · DOI · Paper page
- Tyagi M, Rusnati M, Presta M, Giacca M (2001) Internalization of HIV-1 Tat requires cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J Biol Chem 276:3254–3261. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006701200 · DOI
- Urich E, Schmucki R, Ruderisch N et al (2015) Cargo delivery into the brain by in vivo identified transport peptides. Sci Rep 5:14104. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14104 · DOI
- Van Rooy I, Cakir-Tascioglu S, Couraud PO et al (2010) Identification of peptide ligands for targeting to the blood-brain barrier. Pharm Res 27:673–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0053-6 · DOI
- Van Rooy I, Hennink WE, Storm G et al (2012) Attaching the phage display-selected GLA peptide to liposomes: factors influencing target binding. Eur J Pharm Sci 45:330–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2011.11.015 · DOI
- Vela Ramirez JE, Sharpe LA, Peppas NA (2017) Current state and challenges in developing oral vaccines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.008 · DOI
- Walter E, Kissel T, Amidon GL (1996) The intestinal peptide carrier: a potential transport system for small peptide derived drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 20:33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-409X(95)00129-U · DOI
- Wang X, Zhen X, Wang J et al (2013) Doxorubicin delivery to 3D multicellular spheroids and tumors based on boronic acid-rich chitosan nanoparticles. Biomaterials 34:4667–4679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.008 · DOI
- Wang C-FC-F., Sarparanta MP, Mäkilä EM et al (2015a) Multifunctional porous silicon nanoparticles for cancer theranostics. Biomaterials 48:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.008 · DOI
- Wang J, Yadav V, Smart AL et al (2015b) Toward oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals: an assessment of the gastrointestinal stability of 17 peptide drugs. Mol Pharm 12:966–973. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500809f · DOI
- Wang L, Hao Y, Li H et al (2015c) Co-delivery of doxorubicin and siRNA for glioma therapy by a brain targeting system: angiopep-2-modified poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles. J Drug Target 2330:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2015.1025077 · DOI
- Wang Z, Zhao Y, Jiang Y et al (2015d) Enhanced anti-ischemic stroke of ZL006 by T7-conjugated PEGylated liposomes drug delivery system. Sci Rep 5:12651. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12651 · DOI
- Wang N, Jin X, Guo D et al (2017) Iron chelation nanoparticles with delayed saturation as an effective therapy for parkinson disease. Biomacromol 18:461–474. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01547 · DOI
- Wängler C, Nada D, Höfner G et al (2011) In vitro and initial in vivo evaluation of 68 Ga-labeled transferrin receptor (TfR) binding peptides as potential carriers for enhanced drug transport into TfR expressing cells. Mol Imaging Biol 13:332–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0329-6 · DOI
- Wickham TJ (2000) Targeting adenovirus. Gene Ther 7:110–114. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301115 · DOI
- Winer I, Wang S, Lee YEK et al (2010) F3-targeted cisplatin-hydrogel nanoparticles as an effective therapeutic that targets both murine and human ovarian tumor endothelial cells in vivo. Cancer Res 70:8674–8683. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1917 · DOI
- Woodley JF (1994) Enzymatic barriers for GI peptide and protein delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 11:61–95
- Wu Y, Luo X, Liu X et al (2015) Intraperitoneal administration of a Novel TAT-BDNF peptide ameliorates cognitive impairments via modulating multiple pathways in two alzheimer’s rodent models. Sci Rep 5:15032. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15032 · DOI
- Xia H, Anderson B, Mao Q, Davidson BL (2000) Recombinant human adenovirus: targeting to the human transferrin receptor improves gene transfer to brain microcapillary endothelium. J Virol 74:11359–11366. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.74.23.11359-11366.2000 · DOI
- Yamaguchi S, Ito S, Kurogi-Hirayama M, Ohtsuki S (2017) Identification of cyclic peptides for facilitation of transcellular transport of phages across intestinal epithelium in vitro and in vivo. J Control Release 262:232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.037 · DOI
- Yan C, Gu J, Hou D et al (2015) Improved tumor targetability of Tat-conjugated PAMAM dendrimers as a novel nanosized anti-tumor drug carrier. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 41:617–622. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2014.891127 · DOI
- Yan F, Wu H, Liu H et al (2016) Molecular imaging-guided photothermal/photodynamic therapy against tumor by iRGD-modified indocyanine green nanoparticles. J Control Release 224:217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.050 · DOI
- Yao VJ, D’Angelo S, Butler KS et al (2016) Ligand-targeted theranostic nanomedicines against cancer. J Control Release 240:267–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.002 · DOI
- Yoo MK, Kang SK, Choi JH et al (2010) Targeted delivery of chitosan nanoparticles to Peyer’s patch using M cell-homing peptide selected by phage display technique. Biomaterials 31:7738–7747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.059 · DOI
- Yu KF, Zhang WQ, Luo LM et al (2013) The antitumor activity of a doxorubicin loaded, iRGD-modified sterically-stabilized liposome on B16-F10 melanoma cells: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Nanomed 8:2473–2485. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S46962 · DOI
- Yun Y, Cho YW, Park K (2013) Nanoparticles for oral delivery: targeted nanoparticles with peptidic ligands for oral protein delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:822–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.10.007 · DOI
- Zhang L, Song L, Zhang C, Ren Y (2012) Improving intestinal insulin absorption efficiency through coadministration of cell-penetrating peptide and hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin. Carbohydr Polym 87:1822–1827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.002 · DOI
- Zhang B, Sun X, Mei H et al (2013a) LDLR-mediated peptide-22-conjugated nanoparticles for dual-targeting therapy of brain glioma. Biomaterials 34:9171–9182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.039 · DOI
- Zhang C, Wan X, Zheng X et al (2013b) Biomaterials dual-functional nanoparticles targeting amyloid plaques in the brains of Alzheimer’ s disease mice. Biomaterials 35:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.063 · DOI
- Zhang C, Zheng X, Wan X et al (2014) The potential use of H102 peptide-loaded dual-functional nanoparticles in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J Control Release 192:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.050 · DOI
- Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Li K et al (2015) A novel strategy to improve the therapeutic efficacy of Gemcitabine for non-small cell lung cancer by the tumor-penetrating peptide iRGD. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129865 · DOI
- Zhang Y, Zhai M, Chen Z et al (2017) Dual-modified liposome codelivery of doxorubicin and vincristine improve targeting and therapeutic efficacy of glioma. Drug Deliv 24:1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2017.1344334 · DOI
- Zhu Z, Xie C, Liu Q et al (2011) The effect of hydrophilic chain length and iRGD on drug delivery from poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32:9525–9535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.072 · DOI
- Zhu S, Chen S, Gao Y et al (2015) Enhanced oral bioavailability of insulin using PLGA nanoparticles co-modified with cell-penetrating peptides and engrailed secretion peptide (Sec). Drug Deliv 0:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2015.1043472 · DOI
- Zong T, Mei L, Gao H et al (2014) Synergistic dual-ligand doxorubicin liposomes improve targeting and therapeutic efficacy of brain glioma in animals. Mol Pharm 11:2346–2357. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500057n · DOI
- Zupančič O, Bernkop-Schnürch A (2017) Lipophilic peptide character—what oral barriers fear the most. J Control Release 255:242–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.04.038 · DOI
- Zuris JA, Thompson DB, Shu Y et al (2014) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 33:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3081 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategic approaches for colon targeted drug delivery: an overview of recent advancements
Lee, S. H., Bajracharya, R., Min, J. Y., Han, J.-W., Park, B. J., & Han, H.-K. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12010068 · Cited by 318
Advances in colon-targeted nano-drug delivery systems: challenges and solutions
Naeem, M., Awan, U. A., Subhan, F., Cao, J., Hlaing, S. P., Lee, J., Im, E., Jung, Y., & Yoo, J.-W. (2020) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-020-01219-0 · Cited by 248
Verma, S., Goand, U. K., Husain, A., Katekar, R. A., Garg, R., & Gayen, J. R. (2021) · Drug Development Research · doi:10.1002/ddr.21832 · Cited by 151
Current Advances in Chitosan Nanoparticles Based Oral Drug Delivery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment
Choukaife, H., Seyam, S., Alallam, B., Doolaanea, A. A., & Alfatama, M. (2022) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s375229 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosh, D., Peng, X., Leal, J., & Mohanty, R. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
- Published
- 2017-12-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-111
- ISSN
- 2093-5552
- 2093-6214
- PMC
- PMC6023411
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL138251-01)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review