Cited by 183Advanced Materials and MechanicsAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesPolymer composites and self-healing

Review of 4D printing materials and their properties

Shin, Dong-Gap, Kim, Tae-Hyeong, Kim, Dae-Eun·2017·International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40684-017-0040-z

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, D.-G., Kim, T.-H., & Kim, D.-E.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Dae-Eun
Venue
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology
Published
2017-07
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
349-357
ISSN
  • 2198-0810 (ISSN-L)
  • 2288-6206
OpenAlex
W2736163128
Cited by
183
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
4D printing, stimuli-responsive materials, smart materials, actuation, mechanical properties, shape-changing materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review