Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design

Suchman, Lucy A.·1987·Artificial Intelligence

DOI 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90024-5

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90024-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence
Steuer, J. (1992) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x · Cited by 5,459
SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(99)00115-6 · Cited by 4,135
Multiagent systems: algorithmic, game-theoretic, and logical foundations
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5662 · Cited by 1,756
The 1987 Presidential Address Learning In School and Out
Resnick, L. B. (1987) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x016009013 · Cited by 1,035
Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations
Gherardi, S. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072001 · Cited by 859
Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach
Berg, M. (1999) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00011-8 · Cited by 786
Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach
Birhane, A. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205 · Cited by 707
Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research
Goldkuhl, G. (2012) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.54 · Cited by 541
Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations
DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.6.693 · Cited by 495
“It doesn’t matter what you are!” Explaining social effects of agents and avatars
von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Gratch, J., & Kang, S.-H. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012 · Cited by 389
Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer‐Based Interviewing Systems1
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x · Cited by 363
Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework
Rieh, S. Y., & Danielson, D. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114 · Cited by 336
A Demonstration of the Transition from Ready-to-Hand to Unready-to-Hand
Dotov, D. G., Nie, L., & Chemero, A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009433 · Cited by 135
How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI
Jakesch, M., Buçinca, Z., Amershi, S., & Olteanu, A. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533097 · Cited by 116
Implications of neural networks for how we think about brain function
Robinson, D. A. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00072563 · Cited by 107
Sensible AI: Re-imagining Interpretability and Explainability using Sensemaking Theory
Kaur, H., Adar, E., Gilbert, E., & Lampe, C. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533135 · Cited by 92
Participation, the camel and the elephant of design: an introduction
Greenbaum, J., & Loi, D. (2012) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.690232 · Cited by 80
Exploring how children use their hands to think: an embodied interactional analysis
Antle, A. N. (2013) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.630415 · Cited by 76
Agency as commitment to meaning: communicative competence in games
Tanenbaum, K., & Tanenbaum, T. J. (2010) · Digital Creativity · doi:10.1080/14626261003654509 · Cited by 84
A visit to the 'new Utopia': revitalizing democracy, emancipation and quality in co-operative design
Iversen, O. S., Kanstrup, A. M., & Petersen, M. G. (2004) · Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction · doi:10.1145/1028014.1028040 · Cited by 36
Searching for the Non-Consequential: Dialectical Activities in HCI and the Limits of Computers
Zhang, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641945 · Cited by 12
Discourse/s in/of CSCW
Roth, W.-M., Tenenberg, J., & Socha, D. (2016) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-016-9258-5 · Cited by 10

Authors: Suchman, L. A.
Venue: Artificial Intelligence
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1987-02
Volume: 31
Issue: 2
Pages: 227-232
ISSN: 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90024-5
OpenAlex: W2315385127
Cited by: 1,055
References: 0
FWCI: 16.09
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review