CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeuroscience and Music PerceptionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of midline frontolimbic cortex in production of the isolation call of squirrel monkeys

MacLean, Paul D., Newman, John D.·1988·Brain Research
DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91550-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since the separation cry of mammals serves to maintain (1) mother-offspring contact and (2) contact between members of a group, it probably ranks as a basic mammalian vocalization. The present study is part of an investigation concerned with identifying the cerebral representation of the separation call in squirrel monkeys. For this purpose, monkeys are tested for their ability to produce spontaneous calls in isolation before and after ablations of different parts of the brain. Because of the subject's auditory and visual isolation, the call emitted during testing is referred to as the isolation call. In a preceding study, it was shown that lesions at the thalamomidbrain junction and in the ventral central gray interfere with the structure and/or production of the call. The present study focuses on the rostral midline limbic cortex, known to be one of the two cortical areas where stimulation elicits vocalization in monkeys. Evidence derived by the process of elimination indicates that the spontaneous call depends on the concerted action of a continuous band of rostral limbic cortex comprising parts of areas 24, 25, and 12. The midline frontal neocortex peripheral to this limbic zone does not appear to be essential for the call.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91550-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In behavioral neuroscience, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex has been linked to sadness because of its role in producing infant separation vocalizations, but the link between infant vocalizations and unpleasant affect is questioned.

    “In the behavioral neuroscience literature, pACC has been linked to sadness because of its role in producing the vocalizations that infant animals make when separated from their mother (e.g., MacLean & Newman 1988; see Panksepp 1998; 2007); the link between infant vocalizations and unpleasant affect are in question, however (Blumberg & Sokoloff 2001).”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as MacLean & Newman 1988

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Baleydier, 1980, The duality of the cingulate gyrus in monkey. Neuroanatomical study and functional hypothesis, Brain, 103, 525, 10.1093/brain/103.3.525 · DOI
  2. Brown, 1967, Physiology and phylogenesis of emotional expression, Brain Research, 5, 1, 10.1016/0006-8993(67)90215-6 · DOI
  3. Carmel, 1970, Efferent projections of the ventral anterior nucleus of the thalamus in the monkey, Am. J. Anat., 128, 159, 10.1002/aja.1001280204 · DOI
  4. Carpenter, 1976, Anatomical organization of the corpus striatum and related nuclei, The Basal Ganglia, Res. Publ. Assoc. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 55, 1
  5. Casey, 1966, Unit analysis of nociceptive mechanisms in the thalamus of the awake squirrel monkey, J. Neurophysiol., 29, 727, 10.1152/jn.1966.29.4.727 · DOI
  6. Cramon, 1983, The anterior cingulate cortex and the phonatory control in monkey and man, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 7, 423, 10.1016/0149-7634(83)90049-0 · DOI
  7. Crompton, 1973, Mammals from reptiles: a review of mammalian origins, Annu. Rev. Earth Plan. Sci., 1, 131, 10.1146/annurev.ea.01.050173.001023 · DOI
  8. Dua, 1964, Localization for penile erection in medial frontal lobe, Am. J. Physiol., 207, 1425, 10.1152/ajplegacy.1964.207.6.1425 · DOI
  9. Foltz, 1957, Experimental cingulomotomy and modification of morphine withdrawal, J. Neurosurg., 14, 655, 10.3171/jns.1957.14.6.0655 · DOI
  10. Goldman-Rakic, 1985, The primate mediodorsal (MD) nucleus and its projection to the frontal lobe, J. Comp. Neurol., 242, 535, 10.1002/cne.902420406 · DOI
  11. Hassler, 1961, Motorische und sensible Effekte umschriebener Reizungen und Ausschaltungen im menschlichen Zwischenhirn, Dtsch. Zeitschr. Nervenheilk., 183, 148
  12. Hershkovitz, 1984, Taxonomy of squirrel monkeys genus Saimiri (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): a preliminary report with description of a hitherto unnamed form, Am. J. Primatol., 7, 155, 10.1002/ajp.1350070212 · DOI
  13. Jonas, 1981, The supplementary motor region and speech emission, J. Commun. Dis., 14, 349, 10.1016/0021-9924(81)90019-8 · DOI
  14. Jürgens, 1983, Afferent fibers to the cingular vocalization region in the squirrel monkey, Exp. Neurol., 80, 395, 10.1016/0014-4886(83)90291-1 · DOI
  15. Jürgens, 1984, The efferent and afferent connections of the supplementary motor area, Brain Research, 300, 63, 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91341-6 · DOI
  16. Jürgens, 1970, Cerebral representation of vocalization in the squirrel monkey, Exp. Brain Res., 10, 532, 10.1007/BF00234269 · DOI
  17. Kaada, 1951, Acta Physiol. Scand., 24, 1
  18. Kirzinger, 1982, Cortical lesion effects and vocalization in the squirrel monkey, Brain Research, 233, 299, 10.1016/0006-8993(82)91204-5 · DOI
  19. Krayenbühl, 1961, Bilateral thalamotomy and pallidotomy as treatment for bilateral Parkinsonism, J. Neurosurg., 18, 429, 10.3171/jns.1961.18.4.0429 · DOI
  20. MacLean, 1964, Mirror display in the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus, Science, 146, 950, 10.1126/science.146.3646.950 · DOI
  21. MacLean, 1985, Brain evolution relating to family, play, and the separation call, Arch. Gen. Psychiatr., 42, 405, 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790270095011 · DOI
  22. Müller-Preuss, 1976, Projections from the ‘cingular’ vocalization area in the squirrel monkey, Brain Research, 103, 29, 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90684-3 · DOI
  23. Newman, J.D., Ethopharmacology of vocal behavior in primates. In D. Todt, P. Goedeking and D. Symmes (Eds.), Primate Vocal Communications, Springer, Berlin, in press. · DOI
  24. Newman, 1982, Effects of tegmental lesions on the isolation call of squirrel monkeys, Brain Research, 232, 317, 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90276-1 · DOI
  25. Newman, 1985, Importance of medial frontolimbic cortex in production of the isolation call of squirrel monkeys, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 11, 495
  26. Newman, 1982, Naloxone-reversible suppression of isolation call production after morphine injections in squirrel monkeys, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 8, 940
  27. Penfield, 1951, The supplementary motor area of the cerebral cortex, Arch. Neurol. Psychiatr., 66, 289, 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1951.02320090038004 · DOI
  28. Ploog, 1981, Neurobiology of primate audio-vocal behavior, Brain Res. Rev., 3, 35, 10.1016/0165-0173(81)90011-4 · DOI
  29. Pribram, 1953, Limit and organization of the cortical projection from the medial thalamic nucleus in monkey, J. Comp. Neurol., 98, 433, 10.1002/cne.900980304 · DOI
  30. Robinson, 1967, Vocalization evoked from forebrain in Macaca mulatta, Physiol. Behav., 2, 345, 10.1016/0031-9384(67)90050-9 · DOI
  31. Rosabal, 1967, Cytoarchitecture of the frontal lobe of the squirrel monkey, J. Comp. Neurol., 130, 87, 10.1002/cne.901300202 · DOI
  32. Sutton, 1974, Neocortical and limbic lesion effects on primate phonation, Brain Research, 71, 61, 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90191-7 · DOI
  33. Symmes, 1979, Individuality and stability of isolation peeps in squirrel monkeys, Anim. Behav., 27, 1142, 10.1016/0003-3472(79)90062-9 · DOI
  34. Trachy, 1981, Primate phonation: anterior cingulate lesion effects on response rate and acoustal structure, Am. J. Primatol., 1, 43, 10.1002/ajp.1350010106 · DOI
  35. Vogt, 1987, Cingulate cortex of rhesus monkey. I. Cytoarchitecture and thalamic afferents, J. Comp. Neurol., 262, 256, 10.1002/cne.902620207 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Winter, 1969, Dialects in squirrel monkeys: vocalization of the roman arch type, Folia Primatol, 10, 216, 10.1159/000155201 · DOI
  37. Wise, 1982, Opiate receptor distribution in the cerebral cortex of the rhesus monkey, Science, 218, 387, 10.1126/science.6289441 · DOI
  38. Wyss, 1945, Ein Hochfrequenz-Koagulationsgerät zur Reizlosen Ausschaltung, Helv. Physiol. Acta, 3, 437

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
MacLean, P. D., & Newman, J. D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
MacLean, Paul D.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-05
Volume
450
Issue
1-2
Pages
111-123
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0006-8993(88)91550-8
OpenAlex
W1991162251
Cited by
130
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
isolation calls, squirrel monkey, vocalizations, cortical lesions
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cebidae, Female, Frontal Lobe, Limbic System, Male, Neural Pathways, Saimiri, Vocalization, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review