Cited by 349Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ROSTRAL CINGULAR CORTEX AS REVEALED BY ITS RESPONSES TO ELECTRICAL EXCITATION

Smith, Wilbur K.·1945·Journal of Neurophysiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1945.8.4.241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrical stimulation in monkeys and other animals elicits autonomic responses from MFa and OFa, but not from PFm or PFo.

    “Several studies in monkeys and other animals, such as the one illustrated in Figure 2, show that electrical stimulation elicits autonomic responses from MFa and OFa, but not from PFm or PFo (54–60).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, W. K.
Corresponding author
Smith, Wilbur K.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1945-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
241-255
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2321381913
Cited by
349
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
cingulate cortex, electrical stimulation, cortical responses, functional significance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review