Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language

Johnson, Jacqueline S., Newport, Elissa L.·1991·Cognition
DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90054-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90054-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Allwood, 1976, The complex np constraint as a non-universal rule and some semantic factors influencing the acceptability of Swedish sentences which violate the CNPC, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 1
  2. Bateson, 1979, How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for?, Animal Behavior, 27, 470, 10.1016/0003-3472(79)90184-2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bley-Vroman, 1988, The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning, Second Language Research, 4, 1, 10.1177/026765838800400101 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Clahsen, 1986, The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order, Second Language Research, 2, 10.1177/026765838600200201 · DOI · Paper page
  5. duPlessis, 1987, UG or not UG, that is the question: A reply to Clahsen and Muysken, Second Language Research, 3.1
  6. Erteschik, 1973, On the nature of island constraints, MIT Dissertation
  7. Gold, 1967, Language identification in the limit, Information and Control, 10, 447, 10.1016/S0019-9958(67)91165-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Johnson, 1989, Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language, Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60, 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Oyama, 1978, The sensitive period and comprehension of speech, Working Papers on Bilingualism, 16, 1
  10. Patkowski, 1980, The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language, Language Learning, 30, 449, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00328.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Sportiche, 1981, On bounding nodes in French, Linguistic Review, 1, 219, 10.1515/tlir.1981.1.2.219 · DOI
  12. Torrego, 1984, On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects, Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 103

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-06
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
215-258
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0010-0277(91)90054-8
OpenAlex
W2129486857
Cited by
416
References
3
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.