Cited by 156EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesECG Monitoring and AnalysisNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Cephalic skin potentials in electroencephalography

Picton, T.W, Hillyard, S.A·1972·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90122-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Picton, T. W., & Hillyard, S. A.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1972-10
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
419-424
ISSN
0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998574272
Cited by
156
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
sweat gland activity, sensory stimulation
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Arousal, Atropine, Contingent Negative Variation, Electroencephalography, Electrophysiology, Humans, Iontophoresis, Reaction Time, Scalp, Skin, Sweating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review