Cited by 41Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

All about the Money ? External Performance Monitoring is Affected by Monetary, but Not by Socially Conveyed Feedback Cues in More Antisocial Individuals

Open access
Pfabigan, Daniela Melitta, Alexopoulos, Johanna, Bauer, Herbert, Lamm, Claus, Sailer, Uta·2011·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between feedback processing and antisocial personality traits measured by the PSSI questionnaire (Kuhl and Kazén, 1997) in a healthy undergraduate sample. While event-related potentials [feedback related negativity (FRN), P300] were recorded, participants encountered expected and unexpected feedback during a gambling task. As recent findings suggest learning problems and deficiencies during feedback processing in clinical populations of antisocial individuals, we performed two experiments with different healthy participants in which feedback about monetary gains or losses consisted either of social-emotional (facial emotion displays) or non-social cues (numerical stimuli). Since the FRN and P300 are both sensitive to different aspects of feedback processing we hypothesized that they might help to differentiate between individuals scoring high and low on an antisocial trait measure. In line with previous evidence FRN amplitudes were enhanced after negative and after unexpected feedback stimuli. Crucially, participants scoring high on antisocial traits displayed larger FRN amplitudes than those scoring low only in response to expected and unexpected negative numerical feedback, but not in response to social-emotional feedback - irrespective of expectancy. P300 amplitudes were not modulated by antisocial traits at all, but by subjective reward probabilities. The present findings indicate that individuals scoring high on antisociality attribute higher motivational salience to monetary compared to emotional-social feedback which is reflected in FRN amplitude enhancement. Contrary to recent findings, however, no processing deficiencies concerning social-emotional feedback stimuli were apparent in those individuals. This indicates that stimulus salience is an important aspect in learning and feedback processes in individuals with antisocial traits which has potential implications for therapeutic interventions in clinical populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00100

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two reports showed that social rewards (e.g., affirmative faces) elicited robust P3 and FRN responses comparable with those evoked by monetary rewards.

    “Although most normative studies have focused on the effect of monetary reward on these components, more recently, two reports showed that social rewards (for example, affirmative faces) elicited robust P3 and FRN responses comparable with those evoked by monetary rewards [92,93].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Luu P. Shane M. Pratt N. L. Tucker D. M. (2009). Corticolimbic mechanisms in the control of trial and error learning. Brain Res. 1247, 100– 113 10.1162/089976699300016719 18952071 PMC2650437 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Nieuwenhuis S. Holroyd C. B. Mol N. Coles M. G. H. (2004). Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 28, 441– 448 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788 15289008 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Potts G. F. Martin L. E. Burton P. Montague P. R. (2006). When things are better or worse than expected: the medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1112– 1119 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90122-8 16839285 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Sailer U. Fischmeister F. P. Bauer H. (2010). Effects of learning on feedback-related brain potentials in a decision-making task. Brain Res. 1342, 85– 93 10.1186/1744-859X-9-S1-S1 20423704 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfabigan, D. M., Alexopoulos, J., Bauer, H., Lamm, C., & Sailer, U.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Pfabigan, Daniela Melitta
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2011
Volume
5
Pages
100-100
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097842170
Cited by
41
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universität Wien
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
antisocial personality traits, feedback processing, feedback-related negativity, P300, gambling task, motivational salience, stimulus salience, reward probability, antisocial personality disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review