Cited by 96Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Miscarriage and stillbirth: time since the loss, grief intensity and satisfaction with care

Cuisinier, M.C.J., Kuijpers, J.C., Hoogduin, C.A.L., de Graauw, C.P.H.M., Janssen, H.J.E.M.·1993·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the results of a study, conducted in the Netherlands, involving 143 women who experienced a miscarriage or stillbirth (response of 69%). The main questions were: how women with a fetal loss before the 20th week (miscarriage) versus women with a loss later in pregnancy (stillbirth) coped with the death of their baby; how the lapse of time since the loss related to grief intensity; and how satisfied women were with the professional care and support. The relationship between some other variables and grief intensity was also examined. It was found that grief intensity was greater and there was more satisfaction with professional care when gestational age was longer. With regard to the care, we concluded that some aspects needed improvement, especially the professional support for women who miscarry and the coordination of care for all women after discharge from hospital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90066-l

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of support from a partner and poor marital relations are associated with more intense grief after perinatal loss.

    “Following this argument, lack of support from a partner and poor marital relations have both been described as other strong components associated with more intense grief.10,32”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [32]

  • Poor social support from family and friends is associated with complicated grief reactions after perinatal loss.

    “Based on stress theory, social support is thought to have a buffering effect, and poor social support from family and friends is associated with CG reactions.8,10,13,32”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [32]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuisinier, M. C. J., Kuijpers, J. C., Hoogduin, C. A. L., de Graauw, C. P. H. M., & Janssen, H. J. E. M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Reinier de Graaf Hospital (NL)
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-12
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
163-168
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2065998571
Cited by
95
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
miscarriage, stillbirth, fetal death, grief intensity, bereavement, time since loss, gestational age, satisfaction with care, professional support, care coordination, postpartum care
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Fetal Death, Grief, Humans, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review