Cited by 102Agricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management

Effect of charcoal, coal and peat on the yield of moong soybean and pea

Iswaran, V., Jauhri, K.S., Sen, A.·1980·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0038-0717(80)90057-7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iswaran, V., Jauhri, K. S., & Sen, A.
Affiliations
Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
191-192
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986345417
Cited by
102
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Keywords
charcoal, coal, peat, soil amendment, mungbean, soybean, pea, crop yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review