Cited by 1,385Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Unsaturated FlowSoil Management and Crop Yield

Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil

Laird, David A., Fleming, Pierce, Davis, Dedrick D., Horton, Robert, Wang, Baiqun, Karlen, Douglas L.·2010·Geoderma

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.013

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hardwood biochar-amended soil showed greater water retention (up to 15%) at gravity-drained equilibrium and −100 and −500 kPa soil water potentials compared to unamended controls.

    “For example, in a long-term column incubation study on Clarion soil, Laird et al. (2010) reported that hardwood biochar-amended soil showed greater water retention (up to 15%) at gravity-drained equilibrium and À100 and À500 kPa soil water potentials compared to unamended controls.”

    From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Laird et al., 2010

  • A long-term, 500 days, soil column incubation experiment indicated increases in specific surface area (up to 18%) of an amended clayey soil when hardwood biochar was applied at rates up to 20 g kg−1.

    “A long-term, 500 days, soil column incubation experiment indicated increases in specific surface area (up to 18%) of an amended clayey soil when hardwood biochar was applied at rates up to 20 g kg À1 (Laird et al., 2010).”

    From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Laird et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laird, D. A., Fleming, P., Davis, D. D., Horton, R., Wang, B., & Karlen, D. L.
Affiliations
  • National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Laird, David A.
Venue
Geoderma
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
158
Issue
3-4
Pages
443-449
ISSN
0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073852890
Cited by
1,385
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 108 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 56
FWCI
59.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geoderma (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
biochar, soil amendment, soil quality, soil fertility, pig manure, soil water retention, cation exchange capacity, bulk density, hydraulic conductivity, soil organic carbon, nitrogen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review