The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In search of useful theory of innovation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · Cited by 1,712
Upgrading in Global Value Chains: Lessons from Latin American Clusters
Giuliani, E., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2005) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.01.002 · Cited by 1,073
The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution
Clark, K. B. (1985) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90007-1 · Cited by 958
The social shaping of technology
Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2 · Cited by 917
An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics
Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01236366 · Cited by 804
Self-citationDwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., Andreini, D., Abumoghli, I., Barlette, Y., Bunker, D., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456 · Cited by 761
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 · Cited by 661
Murmann, J. P., & Frenken, K. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011 · Cited by 654
The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsz022 · Cited by 634
Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00118-9 · Cited by 526
The fruit flies of innovations: a taxonomy of innovative small firms
de Jong, J. P. J., & Marsili, O. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.007 · Cited by 445
Towards a theory of the technology-based firm
Granstrand, O. (1998) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00067-5 · Cited by 418
A Theory of Defensive Skill-Biased Innovation and Globalization
Thoenig, M., & Verdier, T. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322157052 · Cited by 340
Bolton, R., & Hannon, M. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.003 · Cited by 312
A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909–1997)
Frenken, K. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00064-5 · Cited by 221
Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies
Wilson, C. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.077 · Cited by 210
Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors
Clausen, T. H., Demircioglu, M. A., & Alsos, G. A. (2020) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12617 · Cited by 175
van den Ende, J., & Kemp, R. (1999) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00027-x · Cited by 162
INSTITUTIONS AND MARKETS IN A DYNAMIC WORLD
DOSI, G. (1988) · The Manchester School · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1988.tb01323.x · Cited by 159
On the role of outsiders in technical development
Van De Poel, I. (2000) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320050130615 · Cited by 148
The evolutionary ecology of technological innovations
Solée, R. V., Valverde, S., Casals, M. R., Kauffman, S. A., Farmer, D., & Eldredge, N. (2013) · Complexity · doi:10.1002/cplx.21436 · Cited by 140
Knowledge Creation and Organizational Capabilities of Innovating and Imitating Firms
Lewin, A. Y., & Massini, S. (2004) · Organizations as Knowledge Systems · doi:10.1057/9780230524545_10 · Cited by 108
Engineers and Active Responsibility
Pesch, U. (2015) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9571-7 · Cited by 38
The Institutional Domain of Technology Diffusion
Reddy, N. M., Aram, J. D., & Lynn, L. H. (1991) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.840295 · Cited by 36
Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2025) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-11-2023-0233 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-76
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4235903336
- Cited by
- 1,616
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.