The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Employees frequently give technical information or advice to colleagues in other firms, including direct competitors. This paper addresses whether such information-transfer is in the economic interests of the firms involved. It is hypothesized that employees trade information in accordance with the economic interests of their firms. Conditions are discussed in which information trading creates an economic advantage for the participating firms. Data on specific information transfer decisions were obtained from a survey of 294 technically oriented middle-level managers from the U.S. specialty steel and mini-mill industry. The observed pattern of information transfer strongly supports the hypotheses (1) that employees trade information and (2) that such trading is desirable from a firm's point of view. Furthermore, the data suggest a positive link between the participation of a firm's employees in informal informationtransfer networks and the economic performance of the firm. Indeed, it can be in a firm's interest to make its boundaries penetrable for informal information trading rather than to discourage such transfers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Emerson, R. M. (1976) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003 · Cited by 3,457
New directions in equity research.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033967 · Cited by 1,649
Cited by
Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms
Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600201 · Cited by 1,337
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1 · Cited by 772
An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes
Grandori, A. (1997) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069701800601 · Cited by 368
Contingencies of innovative networks: A case study of successful interfirm R & D collaboration
Häusler, J., Hohn, H.-W., & Lütz, S. (1994) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)90026-4 · Cited by 136
Implementation research: state of the art and future directions
Linton, J. D. (2002) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00075-x · Cited by 126
The Effect of Employer Networks on Workplace Innovation and Training
Erickson, C. L., & Jacoby, S. M. (2003) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979390305600201 · Cited by 114
Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process: an empirical study
Conway, S. (1995) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537329508524216 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Schrader, S.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-170
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097635326
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.