The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise
Chandler, A. D. (1992) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.6.3.79 · Cited by 847
Cited by
Sectoral systems of innovation and production
Malerba, F. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1 · Cited by 2,733
Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy
Adner, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316678451 · Cited by 2,600
Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity
Gilbert, C. G. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803920 · Cited by 1,375
Circular business models: a review
Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Soufani, K. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741 · Cited by 1,089
Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise
Chandler, A. D. (1992) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.6.3.79 · Cited by 847
Murmann, J. P., & Frenken, K. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011 · Cited by 654
Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context
Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2014) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2011.0105 · Cited by 639
Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation
Martins, L. L., Rindova, V. P., & Greenbaum, B. E. (2015) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1191 · Cited by 581
The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem
Ansari, S. (., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2442 · Cited by 556
Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2010 · Cited by 502
The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change
LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1998) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/7.2.217 · Cited by 452
A literature review of disruptive innovation: What it is, how it works and where it goes
Si, S., & Chen, H. (2020) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101568 · Cited by 226
Bohlmann, J. D., Golder, P. N., & Mitra, D. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1175.175 · Cited by 180
Multi-mode interaction among technologies
Pistorius, C. W. I., & Utterback, J. M. (1997) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00916-x · Cited by 175
West, J., & Iansiti, M. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00090-2 · Cited by 110
Magnusson, T., & Werner, V. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3081 · Cited by 80
Managing the transition of technology life cycle
Kim, B. (2003) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00168-2 · Cited by 76
Contextual factors of disruptive innovation: A systematic review and framework
Antonio, J. L., & Kanbach, D. K. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122274 · Cited by 74
Radinger-Peer, V., Sedlacek, S., & Goldstein, H. (2018) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1494136 · Cited by 43
Camps-Aragó, P., Temmerman, L., Vanobberghen, W., & Delaere, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14020921 · Cited by 34
Preißner, S., Raasch, C., & Schweisfurth, T. (2024) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12709 · Cited by 28
Edge AI Driven Technology Advancements Paving Way Towards New Capabilities
Agarwal, G. K., Magnusson, M., & Johanson, A. (2021) · International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management · doi:10.1142/s0219877020400052 · Cited by 27
Beierlein, J. M., McNamee, L. M., Walsh, M. J., Kaitin, K. I., DiMasi, J. A., & Ledley, F. D. (2017) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.001 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 233-257
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109412263
- Cited by
- 1,065
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 50.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
