Cited by 628Memory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Anxiogenic stimuli in the elevated plus-maze

Treit, Dallas, Menard, Janet, Royan, Cary·1993·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Untreated rats normally avoid the open arms of the "elevated plus-maze," preferring instead the closed arms, whereas rats treated with antianxiety drugs (e.g., diazepam) show far less open-arm avoidance. Although it has often been assumed that rats avoid the open arms because of novelty, height, or open space, the anxiogenic role of these stimuli in the plus-maze has not been systematically examined. In Experiment 1, rats were repeatedly exposed to the elevated plus-maze with the expectation that their "fear" of the open arms would habituate over trials. Instead, open-arm avoidance actually increased on the second trial and showed no evidence of habituating after 18 trials. In Experiment 2, three 30-min sessions of confinement to the open arms ("flooding") failed to decrease rats' open-arm avoidance. Instead, rats that had received flooding avoided the open arms significantly more than control rats during the first test. Experiment 3 showed that although diazepam-treated rats avoided the open arms less than vehicle-controls on the first test this difference dissipated across test trials. Further, diazepam had no carryover effect on rats' subsequent avoidance of the open arms in a nondrugged state. In Experiment 4, plus-maze height was varied from 50 to 6 cm, but rats did not display more open-arm activity as maze height decreased. In Experiment 5, height cues were manipulated by placing a "floor" 8 cm beneath one open arm while leaving the floor of the other open arm at 50 cm…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(93)90492-c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benzodiazepines have an anxiolytic effect in the plus-maze.

    “It also had an anxiolytic effect in the plus-maze, another measure of sustained fear in which rats tend to avoid entering an open arm compared with a closed arm on a maze that looks like a plus (Treit et al, 1993a).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treit, D., Menard, J., & Royan, C.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Treit, Dallas
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
463-469
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013990078
Cited by
628
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
elevated plus maze, anxiety, habituation, floods, diazepam, antianxiety drugs, novelty, floor height, rats
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Diazepam, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Male, Psychology, Experimental, Psychopharmacology, Random Allocation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review