The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation
Abstract
The threshold of a cutaneous withdrawal reflex, elicited by calibrated von Frey hairs applied to the foot and leg, has been used to study the development of spinal sensory processing in a group of 50 preterm and full-term infants ranging from 27.5 to 42.5 weeks postconceptional age (PCA). Data sets (108) were collected on initial threshold, the effects of repeated innocuous stimuli, the receptive field of the withdrawal reflex, and the effect of a contralateral stimulus. As reported previously (Fitzgerald et al. 1988, 1989), there was a correlation between PCA and initial threshold. The mean threshold at 29 weeks was 0.237 g (S.E.M. 0.042), whereas the mean threshold at 41 weeks was 0.980 g (S.E.M. 0.134). Repeated stimulation with von Frey hairs led to a significant lowering of threshold or "sensitization" of the reflex in infants of up to 35 weeks PCA. Thereafter, the decrease in threshold was not significant, and habituation was observed. From 27.5 weeks PCA, it was possible to elicit the withdrawal reflex from the whole limb as far up as the top of the thigh and buttock. Below 30 weeks PCA, the thresholds within this receptive field were uniform, but after 30 weeks a gradient of thresholds was observed increasing progressively from the sole of the foot towards the knee. The application of a maintained stimulus to the contralateral limb significantly inhibited withdrawal reflex responses to ipsilateral von Frey hair stimulation, across all age bands. These results illustrate postnatal changes in sensory processing within the human spinal cord.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity
Woolf, C. J. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/306686a0 · Cited by 2,157
Woolf, C. J., & Thompson, S. W. N. (1991) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(91)90100-c · Cited by 1,963
New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology.
(1974) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1974.00490320078016 · Cited by 1,622
Flexion‐reflex of the limb, crossed extension‐reflex, and reflex stepping and standing
Sherrington, C. S. (1910) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1910.sp001362 · Cited by 1,319
Motor control mechanisms in health and disease
Desmedt, J. E. (1983) · Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) · Cited by 1,209
Woolf, C., & Wall, P. (1986) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.06-05-01433.1986 · Cited by 559
Comparative study of perceived pain and nociceptive flexion reflex in man
de Willer, J. C. (1977) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(77)90036-7 · Cited by 559
Pain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices
Craig, K. D., Whitfield, M. F., Grunau, R. V. E., Linton, J., & Hadjistavropoulos, H. D. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90162-i · Cited by 481
WILLER, J. C., ROBY, A., & BARS, D. L. (1984) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/107.4.1095 · Cited by 387
Fitzgerald, M., Millard, C., & McIntosh, N. (1989) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(89)90172-3 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Cited by
The development of nociceptive circuits
Fitzgerald, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1701 · Cited by 778
Self-citationGrunau, R. E., Holsti, L., Haley, D. W., Oberlander, T., Weinberg, J., Solimano, A., Whitfield, M. F., Fitzgerald, C., & Yu, W. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.10.020 · Cited by 393
Infant pain management: a developmental neurobiological approach
Fitzgerald, M., & Walker, S. M. (2009) · Nature Clinical Practice Neurology · doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0984 · Cited by 292
Self-citationSummary Proceedings From the Neonatal Pain-Control Group
Anand, K. J. S., Aranda, J. V., Berde, C. B., Buckman, S., Capparelli, E. V., Carlo, W., Hummel, P., Johnston, C. C., Lantos, J., Tutag-Lehr, V., et al. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0620c · Cited by 276
Invasive Procedures in Preterm Children: Brain and Cognitive Development at School Age
Vinall, J., Miller, S. P., Bjornson, B. H., Fitzpatrick, K. P. V., Poskitt, K. J., Brant, R., Synnes, A. R., Cepeda, I. L., & Grunau, R. E. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1863 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, K., & Fitzgerald, M.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-101
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978271409
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90154-6
- The paper
- Andrews, K., & Fitzgerald, M. (1994). The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90154-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.