Cited by 2,157Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity

Woolf, Clifford J.·1983·Nature

Abstract

Noxious skin stimuli which are sufficiently intense to produce tissue injury, characteristically generate prolonged post-stimulus sensory disturbances that include continuing pain, an increased sensitivity to noxious stimuli and pain following innocuous stimuli. This could result from either a reduction in the thresholds of skin nociceptors (sensitization) or an increase in the excitability of the central nervous system so that normal inputs now evoke exaggerated responses. Because sensitization of peripheral receptors occurs following injury, a peripheral mechanism is widely held to be responsible for post-injury hypersensitivity. To investigate this I have now developed an animal model where changes occur in the threshold and responsiveness of the flexor reflex following peripheral injury that are analogous to the sensory changes found in man. Electrophysiological analysis of the injury-induced increase in excitability of the flexion reflex shows that it in part arises from changes in the activity of the spinal cord. The long-term consequences of noxious stimuli result, therefore, from central as well as from peripheral changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/306686a0

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from the rat model suggest that central sensitization, a process thought to underlie pain hypersensitivity, is an important mechanism that contributes with peripheral sensitization to the association between endometriosis and pain.

    “These rat model findings suggest that central sensitization, a process thought to underlie pain hypersensitivity, is an important mechanism”
  • Increased nociceptive activity produces changes in the excitability of spinal neurons (central sensitization), which can expand from spinal segments where the fibers enter to more remote regions.

    “This increased nociceptive activity in turn produces changes in the excitability of spinal neurons, a phenomenon called central sensitization [19], [20], which can expand from spinal segments where the fibers enter to more remote regions [21].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woolf, C. J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Woolf, Clifford J.
Venue
Nature
Published
1983-12
Volume
306
Issue
5944
Pages
686-688
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2132829674
Cited by
2,157
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 67
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
central sensitization, flexor reflex, spinal cord excitability, peripheral nerve injury, nociceptor sensitization, animal models of pain, noxious stimuli
MeSH terms
Animals, Decerebrate State, Efferent Pathways, Electric Conductivity, Motor Neurons, Muscles, Pain, Reflex, Time Factors, Wounds and Injuries, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review