Cited by 105Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Impact of referral bias on clinical and epidemiological studies of Alzheimer's disease

Kokmen, Emre, Özsarfati, Yasef, Beard, C.Mary, O'Brien, Peter C., Rocca, Walter A.·1996·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

We used the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to compare sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in three groups of Alzheimer's disease patients. The first group included incidence cases occurring among residents of Rochester, Minnesota (population-based series; n = 241). The second group was a sample of patients referred to the Mayo Clinic form the remainder of Minnesota and the four surrounding states (n = 58); the third was a sample referred from the remainder of the United States (n = 94). Patients from Rochester were more frequently women, less highly educated, less commonly white collar workers, more frequently institutionalized, less frequently married, and more often lived along than those in the two referral groups. Patients from Rochester also had a more advanced age of onset of dementia. For occupation, education, and living arrangement, the differences across groups increased with increasing distance of referral. Clinical and epidemiological studies based on patients referred form primary to secondary or tertiary care centers may suffer from severe selection bias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00031-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kokmen, E., Özsarfati, Y., Beard, C. M., O'Brien, P. C., & Rocca, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR)
Corresponding author
Kokmen, Emre
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
79-83
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989009094
Cited by
105
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-08031, P30AG008031, AG-06786, U01AG006786)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS17750)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
referral bias, selection bias, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, Rochester Epidemiology Project, sociodemographic factors, age of onset, institutionalization, tertiary care hospital, population-based incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Demography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minnesota, Referral and Consultation, Socioeconomic Factors, Bias, Incidence, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review