The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.
Rundus, D. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031185 · Cited by 797
Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression
Estes, W. K. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048509 · Cited by 511
Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition
Glenberg, A. M. (1979) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197590 · Cited by 444
The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten.
Glover, J. A. (1989) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.392 · Cited by 392
Hintzman, D. L. (1976) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60464-8 · Cited by 388
Spitzer, H. F. (1939) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0063404 · Cited by 306
Disparate Effects of Repeated Testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) Results
Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00036.x · Cited by 254
Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years.
Bahrick, H. P., & Phelphs, E. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.344 · Cited by 228
Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates
Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80090-3 · Cited by 180
Cited by
The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037
Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 · Cited by 1,468
Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x · Cited by 602
Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention
Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440601056620 · Cited by 513
Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.
Butler, A. C. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0019902 · Cited by 492
Metadata
- Authors
- Dempster, F. N.
- Venue
- Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 317-344
- ISSN
- 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2502894192
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/b978-012102570-0/50011-2
- The paper
- Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice. Memory. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012102570-0/50011-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
