Cited by 254Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Disparate Effects of Repeated Testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) Results

Wheeler, Mark A., Roediger, Henry L.·1992·Psychological Science

Abstract

Bartlett (1932) gave subjects a prose passage and showed how recall dropped when they were tested repeatedly. Ballard (1913), using poetry, and Erdelyi and Becker (1974), using pictures, reported improvements in performance (or hypermnesia) over repeated testing. We investigated two likely factors leading to the discrepant results: the type of material and the interval between tests. The primary cause of the differing outcomes is the interval between tests. In general, when the intervals between successive tests are short improvement occurs between tests. When these intervals are long, forgetting occurs. The type of material used plays little role: Hypermnesia in recall of prose (even “The War of the Ghosts”) occurred with short intervals between tests. We also report a striking confirmation of the power of tests to enhance memory: Repeated tests shortly after study greatly improved recall a week later.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00036.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeated testing promotes better retention than taking a single test.

    “Repeated testing has been shown to promote better retention than taking a single test.”

    From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • Rice University
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1992-07
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
240-246
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W1966567975
Cited by
254
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
retesting, hypermnesia, forgetting, test interval, prose recall, picture recall, memory enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review