Cited by 406Sexual function and dysfunction studiesHormonal and reproductive studiesUrological Disorders and Treatments

RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TESTOSTERONE GEL AS ADJUNCTIVE THERAPY TO SILDENAFIL IN HYPOGONADAL MEN WITH ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION WHO DO NOT RESPOND TO SILDENAFIL ALONE

SHABSIGH, R., KAUFMAN, J.M., STEIDLE, C., PADMA-NATHAN, H.·2004·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compare the efficacy of testosterone gel (T-gel) versus placebo as adjunctive therapy to sildenafil in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction who do not respond to sildenafil alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study was performed. A total of 75 hypogonadal men (18 to 80 years old, morning serum total testosterone 400 ng/dl or less) with confirmed lack of response to sildenafil monotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive a daily dose of 1% T-gel or 5 gm placebo gel as adjunctive therapy to 100 mg sildenafil during a 12-week period. Subjects were evaluated for sexual function, primarily based on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), quality of life and serum testosterone levels at baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12. RESULTS: Testosterone treated subjects had greater improvement in erectile function compared to those who received placebo, reaching statistical significance at week 4 (4.4 vs 2.1, p = 0.029, 95.1% CI 0.3, 4.7). Similar trends were observed for improvements in orgasmic function, overall satisfaction, total IIEF score and percentage of IIEF responders. T-gel significantly (p < or =0.004) increased total and free testosterone levels throughout the study, although no significant correlations were made between testosterone levels and the IIEF at end point. CONCLUSIONS: T-gel taken with sildenafil may be beneficial in improving erectile function in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction who are unresponsive to sildenafil alone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ju.0000132389.97804.d7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SHABSIGH, R., KAUFMAN, J. M., STEIDLE, C., & PADMA-NATHAN, H.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2004-08
Volume
172
Issue
2
Pages
658-663
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2121881032
Cited by
406
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 18
FWCI
25.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
testosterone gel, sildenafil, erectile dysfunction, hypogonadism, adjunctive therapy, testosterone replacement therapy, International Index of Erectile Function, serum testosterone levels, male sexual function
MeSH terms
Sildenafil Citrate, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Gels, Humans, Hypogonadism, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors, Piperazines, Purines, Quality of Life, Sulfones, Testosterone, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review