Cited by 58Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationVestibular and auditory disorders

Tinnitus services in the United Kingdom: a survey of patient experiences

Open access
McFerran, Don, Hoare, Derek J., Carr, Simon, Ray, Jaydip, Stockdale, David·2018·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus service provision in the United Kingdom has been investigated from the healthcare provider's perspective demonstrating considerable regional variation particularly regarding availability of psychological treatments. An audiological-based tinnitus service, however, was reportedly available for all tinnitus patients in the UK. The aim of the current study was to define and evaluate nationwide tinnitus healthcare services from the patients' viewpoint. METHODS: Secondary analyses were performed on data from a 33-item questionnaire provided by the British Tinnitus Association. The questionnaire had been distributed via email and social media. RESULTS: Responses from 937 participants who had or had previously experienced tinnitus were analysed. All but one person had at some time consulted their GP. About one in five received medication in primary care. The majority were referred to secondary care, generally an ENT surgeon or audiovestibular physician; some were referred directly to audiological services. In secondary care the majority underwent audiometric testing and over half underwent MRI scanning. Drugs were prescribed less frequently in secondary care. About one third of patients were referred onwards from diagnostic services in secondary care to receive therapeutic interventions for tinnitus. Therapy was generally delivered by an audiologist or hearing therapist. Just under two fifths of people discharged from secondary care returned to their GP, with most returning within one year. Over a third of this group were re-referred to secondary care. Few patients saw a psychologist (2.6%) though some psychological treatments were delivered by appropriately trained audiologists. Negative counselling from healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care settings was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although the UK has developed a national service for patients with tinnitus many people find it difficult to access, being blocked at the primary care level or after secondary care diagnostic services. Many of those discharged from secondary care return to their GP within a short space of time and are re-referred to secondary care creating an unsatisfactory and expensive revolving-door pattern of healthcare. Despite psychological treatment modalities having the best evidence base for successful tinnitus management, only a minority of tinnitus patients ever get to meet a psychologist.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-018-2914-3

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the UK healthcare system, tinnitus patients encounter dual obstacles in accessing psychological interventions: a shortage of mental health professionals and inefficient referral pathways to psychological services.

    “Within the UK healthcare system, for instance, tinnitus patients encounter dual obstacles in accessing psychological interventions: a shortage of mental health professionals and inefficient referral pathways to psychological services (Gander et al., 2011; McFerran et al., 2018).”

    From Research trends and hotspots of cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus: a bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as McFerran et al., 2018

    The Abstract Conclusions report that patients can be blocked at primary care or after secondary-care diagnostic services, and the Conclusions call for alternative referral pathways while noting that only one in forty access psychological services. These passages support an access and referral problem, but they do not identify a shortage of mental health professionals as its cause. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Dauman R Tyler RS Aran JM Dauman R Some considerations on the classification of tinnitus Tinnitus 91 - proceedings of the fourth international tinnitus seminar 1992 Amsterdam Kugler Publications 225 229

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McFerran, D., Hoare, D. J., Carr, S., Ray, J., & Stockdale, D.
Affiliations
  • Essex County Hospital (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
  • British Tinnitus Association (GB)
Corresponding author
McFerran, Don
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2018-02-13
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
110-110
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806240330
Cited by
58
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University College London
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
tinnitus, patient experience, health care access, primary care, secondary care referral, psychological intervention, re-referral, tinnitus management, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Aged, Counseling, Female, United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Tinnitus, Patient Satisfaction, Health Care Surveys, Secondary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review