Cited by 19Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Major depression among adolescent smokers undergoing treatment for nicotine dependence

Killen, Joel D., Robinson, Thomas N., Ammerman, Seth, Hayward, Chris, Rogers, Jayna, Samuels, Deanne, Schatzberg, Alan F.·2004·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

This is the first study to examine the prevalence and effects of major depression (MDD) in a sample of adolescent smokers (N = 211) undergoing treatment for nicotine dependence. We assessed MDD at baseline and end of treatment with the mood disorders portion of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). Eleven percent of participants reported a history of MDD (6% of males and 21% of females). Study variables did not distinguish those with and without a history of MDD. End of treatment abstinence rates and relapse rates were similar in both groups. Two participants (1%), both female, experienced onset of MDD during the treatment. The findings provide further evidence that MDD is a comparatively common disorder among children and adolescents and that clinicians should monitor and be prepared to respond to depression that may emerge during the treatment of nicotine-dependent adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.02.029

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relationship between nicotine dependence and major depression is maintained across adolescents, adults, and adults over age 60.

    “this relationship was maintained across different age groups such as adolescents (Killen et al., 2004), adults (Fergusson et al., 2003), and adults over age 60 (Glassman, Covey, Stetner, & Rivelli, 2001).”

    From Nicotine addiction and psychiatric disorders (2015) · cites this paper as Killen et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Killen, J. D., Robinson, T. N., Ammerman, S., Hayward, C., Rogers, J., Samuels, D., & Schatzberg, A. F.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Killen, Joel D.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1517-1526
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014970858
Cited by
19
References
32
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca080268-04)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA80268)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
major depressive disorder, adolescent smoking, tobacco dependence treatment, depression prevalence, smoking cessation, relapse, gender differences, adolescent mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review