Cited by 217Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild Development and Digital Technology

Loneliness and Facebook motives in adolescence: A longitudinal inquiry into directionality of effect

Teppers, Eveline, Luyckx, Koen, A. Klimstra, Theo, Goossens, Luc·2014·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

The increasing popularity of Facebook among adolescents has stimulated research to investigate the relationship between Facebook use and loneliness, which is particularly prevalent in adolescence. The aim of the present study was to improve our understanding of the relationship between Facebook use and loneliness. Specifically, we examined how Facebook motives and two relationship-specific forms of adolescent loneliness are associated longitudinally. Cross-lagged analysis based on data from 256 adolescents (64% girls, M(age) = 15.88 years) revealed that peer-related loneliness was related over time to using Facebook for social skills compensation, reducing feelings of loneliness, and having interpersonal contact. Facebook use for making new friends reduced peer-related loneliness over time, whereas Facebook use for social skills compensation increased peer-related loneliness over time. Hence, depending on adolescents' Facebook motives, either the displacement or the stimulation hypothesis is supported. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.003

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who use social media to build social connection experience reductions in loneliness, whereas increases tend to be observed in those who resort to digital media as a coping mechanism.

    “Individuals who use social media to build social connection in this way experience reductions in loneliness, whereas increases tend to be observed in those who resort to digital media as a coping mechanism. 20 , 21”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teppers, E., Luyckx, K., A. Klimstra, T., & Goossens, L.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Department Developmental Psychology Tilburg University The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Teppers, Eveline
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-08
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
691-699
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2076304933
Cited by
217
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
24.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
loneliness, Facebook use, adolescent loneliness, displacement theory, online social networking, interpersonal contact
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Attitude, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review