Cited by 451Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationDigital Media and Philosophy

Social Network Sites and Well-Being: The Role of Social Connection

Open access
Clark, Jenna L., Algoe, Sara B., Green, Melanie C.·2018·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

In the early days of the Internet, both conventional wisdom and scholarship deemed online communication a threat to well-being. Later research has complicated this picture, offering mixed evidence about how technology-mediated communication affects users. With the dawn of social network sites, this issue is more important than ever. A close examination of the extensive body of research on social network sites suggests that conflicting results can be reconciled by a single theoretical approach: the interpersonal-connection-behaviors framework. Specifically, we suggest that social network sites benefit their users when they are used to make meaningful social connections and harm their users through pitfalls such as isolation and social comparison when they are not. The benefits and drawbacks of using social network sites shown in existing research can largely be explained by this approach, which also posits the need for studying specific online behaviors in future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721417730833

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online social networking site use tends to be related to less internalizing when it includes positive interactions, enhances social support, and facilitates social connectedness.

    “online social networking site use tends to be related to less internalizing, to the extent that it includes positive interactions, enhances social support, and facilitates social connectedness”

    From Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. (2020) · cites this paper as Clark, Algoe, & Green, 2018

    The Conclusions link connection-promoting social-network use and social support with higher well-being. The Behavior on Social Network Sites and Well-Being section also reports decreased loneliness among adolescents whose Facebook use was motivated by connection. The paper does not establish the broader claim of less internalizing, such as fewer depressive or anxiety symptoms, for positive interactions generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Online social networking site use tends to be associated with more internalizing when it is excessive, reduces in-person interactions, or involves negative interactions or social comparisons.

    “tends to be associated with more internalizing in instances when it is excessive, reduces time spent in in-person interactions, and in which interactions are negative or involve social comparisons”

    From Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. (2020) · cites this paper as Clark, Algoe, & Green, 2018

    In “Associations Between Use of Social Network Sites and Lower Well-Being” (page unavailable), the paper links social comparison to depression and non-interactive use to loneliness. It does not establish that excessive use or negative interactions, as such, are associated with more internalizing; its discussion of displaced face-to-face socializing concerns earlier Internet use rather than social network sites specifically. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ways in which people use social media can influence their well-being.

    “the ways in which they use social media can also influence their well-being,60,61”

    From Social Media Use and Its Link to Physical Health Indicators (2022) · cites this paper as [61]

  • People use social media for a variety of reasons.

    “people use social media for a variety of reasons”

    From Social Media Use and Its Link to Physical Health Indicators (2022) · cites this paper as [61]

  • Passive use of social media (e.g., lurking) has been associated with increased loneliness and lowered well-being.

    “Further, the passive use of social media, in particular (e.g.lurking behaviors; scrolling through others' feeds without actually engaging), has been associated with increased loneliness and lowered well-being [51,52,53 ,54 ,55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Knowles, M. L. (2005). Social snacking and shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bul- lying (pp. 227-242). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  2. Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203-220. doi:10.1177/ 174569161244290 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, J. L., Algoe, S. B., & Green, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Jenna L.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2017-12-19
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
32-37
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2776212678
Cited by
451
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 2
FWCI
44.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
social network sites, well-being, social connectedness, social isolation, social comparison, online communication, technology-mediated communication, online behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review