Cited by 79Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender, Feminism, and MediaImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Sexy online self-presentation on social network sites and the willingness to engage in sexting: A comparison of gender and age

Open access
van Oosten, Johanna M.F., Vandenbosch, Laura·2017·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

The present study investigated whether engaging in sexy self-presentations on social network sites (SNSs) or exposure to sexy self-presentations on SNSs predicts the willingness to engage in sexting. A second aim of the present study was to investigate whether adolescent girls demonstrate stronger relationships between (exposure to) sexy online self-presentations on SNSs and willingness to sext than adolescent boys and young adult men and women. A two-wave panel survey among 953 Dutch adolescents (13-17 years old, 50.7% male) and 899 Dutch young adults (18-25 years old, 43.9% male) showed that engaging in sexy self-presentations on SNSs increased the willingness to engage in sexting, but only among adolescent girls. Exposure to sexy self-presentations of others did not predict the willingness to engage in sexting. The findings call for more research on the role of gender and age in the link between sexy self-presentation and sexting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.11.006

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behaviors such as sexy online self-presentation and concerns about body image make girls more at risk of online sexual harassment.

    “Behaviors such as sexy online self-presentation and concerns about body image make girls more at risk of online sexual harassment [63,64,65].”

    From Cybervictimization and Online Sexual Harassment: Prevalence, Association, and Predictors (2024) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Discussion reports that sexy online self-presentation predicted willingness to sext among adolescent girls and that sexting has been associated with sexual harassment. It does not show that self-presentation directly increases harassment risk, and it does not link body-image concerns to harassment. The claim also states a causal relationship more strongly than the paper does. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gudmundsdottir, A., & Jansz, J. (2016). Sexting, snapchat, and social norms: Because everybody is doing it?. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the international communication association (2016, June). Fukuoka, Japan.
  2. Ringrose, J. (2010). Sluts, whores, fat slags and playboy bunnies: Teen girls' negotiations of "sexy"on social networking sites and at school. In C. Jackson, C. Paechte, & E. Renold (Eds.), Girls and education 3e16: Continuing concerns, new agendas. Basingstoke, UK: Open University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Oosten, J. M. F., & Vandenbosch, L.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) University of Amsterdam Postbus 15791 1001 NG Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-17
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
42-50
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2550205055
Cited by
79
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
sexting, social network sites, online self-presentation, gender differences, age differences, adolescents, young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sex Factors, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review