The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5 · Cited by 10,135
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,087
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis
Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b136381 · Cited by 6,926
Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error
Meeusen, W., & van Den Broeck, J. (1977) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2525757 · Cited by 6,247
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01205442 · Cited by 5,978
An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis
Coelli, T., Rao, D. S. P., & Battese, G. E. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5493-6 · Cited by 4,552
The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths
Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., Coomes, O. T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., et al. (2001) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(01)00007-3 · Cited by 3,788
Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504 · Cited by 3,160
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
“Recent analyses 57,58 have found large yield variations across the world, even among regions with similar growing conditions, suggesting the existence of ‘yield gaps’ (Supplementary Fig.”
BackgroundGlobal food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 · Cited by 7,692
“Yield increases in poorer nations will require significant investments in innovative adaptation of technologies to new soil types, climates, and pests (29, 30) as well as new infrastructure (2).”
BackgroundYield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050
Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., & Foley, J. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066428 · Cited by 3,415
“However, opportunities do exist to increase production through more efficient use of current arable lands [4] and increasing yield growth rates by spreading best management practices and closing yield gaps under different management regimes [38–42] across the globe.”
BackgroundEcological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security
Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D., & Potts, S. G. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012 · Cited by 1,862
Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review
van Ittersum, M. K., Cassman, K. G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., & Hochman, Z. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009 · Cited by 1,652
“Licker et al. (2010) and Neumann et al. (2010) did not discriminate between Yp and Yw—just one value for maximum yield has been estimated.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Neumann, K., Verburg, P. H., Stehfest, E., & Müller, C.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Neumann, Kathleen
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 316-326
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148170135
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 38.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
- Keywords
- yield gap, agricultural intensification, production efficiency, wheat, maize, rice, irrigation, market access, agricultural labor, slope, land management, spatial analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
